ODLH-PBF vs ODLH-Pac, difference in DLH?

Do you not watch fights before you comment on them? Freddie Roach even explained this on your favourite video, the one Bazooka posted on page 2. To quote Freddie: "I saw this on the PBF fight, Oscar doesnt know how to cut the ring off, he follows you and when he follows you, you can land the left all night long". Which is exactly what Pac did. Now that same Oscar used the exact same tactic against PBF, he will follow him, get in range, then unleash a fast combination...PBF ALLLOWED him to do it. Where as Pac would circle away all night, PBF would stand still and attempt to slip and counter those combinations. Because PBF allowed Oscar to get off, Oscar looked more competitive. Hence the point of the thread, the difference was the opponent, not Oscar.

You guarantee PBF punch were harder? Oscar didnt think so, and he was the one getting hit . Your guarantee doesnt mean anything, you have no way of proving it, not even the slightest bit of evidence leaning towards it. If anything all evidence leads to Pac being the harder puncher, by demonstrating it.

 

Wow well done you get quotes from Roach saying Oscar is gonna loose the fight. Must I bother getting quotes from DLH, Dundee & Nacho saying how everything is going good, the weight is good, DLH feeling the best ever blah blah blah so they will win the fight?

And I already answered this. The weight explains why the KO came early, it doesnt explain why oscar was outclassed from round 1. Even Freddie said it, he will be good for 3 rounds, meaning he will still have his legs...yet Pac outclassed him rounds 1, 2 & 3. So the weight issue is irrelevant, because all that would have happened is Oscar would last longer, he was still outclassed from round 1.

 

You say this, but how many experts & fans picked DLH after seeing the weigh in photos? lol, infact I remember plenty of posters saying how Oscar looked good and Pac would get KO'd.

Oscar was the bigger man, if Oscar was really 147 that night, it was because he has trained his body to fight at that weight. He was always better at 147 than he was at 154 anyways.

 

Or you can look at it another angle. DLH should be blaming the weight so when he jumps to 154, he can con the public again, yet he isn't. Roach would be trying to make out like he saw it coming, so that the public further reads into the notion that he's a coach guru who really knows his stuff. :deal

 

And I explained about 100 times. The thing that was wrong with DLH, his stamina because of weight, is irrelevant...simply because DLH was not outclassed from round 6 onwards where his stamina would come into play, he was outclassed from round 1. Freddie himself said he would be good for 3-4 rounds, yet in those 3-4 rounds he was outclassed. So all that weight did was allowed the KO to come earlier than it should have.

 

All in good fun m8. I completely see where you are coming from, Im just being stubborn. My initial post though was based on my observation of DLH in the ring, as a fighter, meaning how he fought. The numbers such as age and weight we knew before and after the fight...sure they had an affect but IMO, the fighter that was DLH was equally skilled in the ring. The difference is he probably had alot less endurance, which again explains the early KO...it still doesnt explain why he was outclassed from round 1. Even Mike Tyson who had bad stamina problems was good for atleast 3 rounds and would win those rounds. Oscar simply didnt. Simply put, if DLH was at 154, he would have fought the same, so outboxed the same, difference is he would have lasted longer.