ODLH-PBF vs ODLH-Pac, difference in DLH?

What r u talkin about...Oscar weighed less than Pac come fight time..Oscar was THE TALLER MAN AGAINST PAC....Against Floyd he outweighed Floyd by 18 lbs on fight night ..Floyd at 150 Oscar at 168...Oscar was weight drained against pac no doubt about it...I TAKE NOTHING AWAY FROM PAC-HE DID A GREAT JOB FIGHTING OSCAR BUT THE FIGHT WAS AT A DIFFERENT WEIGHT THAN WHAT FLOYD FOUGHT OSCAR AT!!!:deal

 

Please just go away, your making yourself look like a complete and total idiot I mean if you have set a goal out today in becomming ESBs most delusional poster your on track so far as it stands today you have become that person.

 

Only a fool or a delusional nuthugger would say it was the same Oscar. Oscar looked like a emaciated dog in the ring. He had no legs and was weak a blind man could see it. I'm not trying to take away what Pac did but it's the truth. Against PBF he was at a weight he was used to and his legs looked much more fresh as well as his body. He only gained two pounds on fight night against Pac that right there tells you everything you need to know.:deal

 

Becuase he was ****ing weight drained do you not understand this? the man weighed in 145 one day later on fight night put on only 2 pounds, usally a fighter puts on close to ten, that explains it to you right there, your just to delusional to accept the reality of the sport, there is no point in even attempting to argue with you, becuase your love for Manny pac is in a way of such that you just wont listen to reasoning.

I have a Pacquiao gloved signed if you want to buy it:good

 

Have you actually seen either of these fights? The #1 reason why Oscar got beat badly by Pacquaio is Pacquaio - he was the better fighter on the night, he is also in his prime and the P4P #1. If you had seen the fight, you would know that Oscar looked like a skeleton, and was severely weight drained and about ten years past his absolute prime.

I don't know what point your trying to make really...."Oscar was not weight drained, not old, not past prime....so Pac's win is even better?" :huh It was a good enough win already, doesn't needed deluded fanboys to build it up more.

 

Exactly. This is not a debate. De La Hoya was intensely weight drained against Pacquiao.

 

Your kidding yourself on, Oscar`s legs & body were stick thin, his punches had practically nothing behind them, his combinations - whenever the **** he actually decided to throw any - had no fluidity & were more push than pop.

Vs Floyd, his shots were more frequent, faster & with plenty of meat behind them.

His punch resistance & stamina were also shattered vs Pac, you could see it in his face, Floyd beat the bigger, fresher, better version.

Enough with this nonsense please.

 

It's not an excuse. It's a ****ing fact. Oscar was unable to be the same fighter in both fights because he was drained in one, had nothing to give.

Oscar could still be solid at 154lbs, I reckon.

 

Mannys Trainer will explain everything in this interview just after the fight
[yt]H0rCgdocMAE[/yt]

 

Age is age regardless of who the fighter is. And by the way, here's an excerpt from your post, " which when your a fighter in your mid-30's". :hat

 

:deal