Offense vs defense in boxing

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by sosolid4u09, May 8, 2010.


  1. sosolid4u09

    sosolid4u09 4 8 15 16 23 42 banned Full Member

    12,433
    3
    Jun 21, 2008
    Im not trying to turn this into a floyd vs pac debate if thats what you think im planning :lol:
    It would be an insult to classify floyd as purely a defensive fighter.
     
  2. Leon

    Leon The Artful Dodger Full Member

    40,234
    13
    Mar 14, 2010
    The person with the vest has a gun himself. It's just not as great. He's also able to destroy his opponents' weapons.

    No one gets to the high levels of boxing without having an effective offense.

    Too late, your boy mrtony80 has already done it.
     
  3. sosolid4u09

    sosolid4u09 4 8 15 16 23 42 banned Full Member

    12,433
    3
    Jun 21, 2008
    But by defensive fighter i didn't just say someone who purely blocks. It involved counter punching. So the bulletproof vest analogy wouldn't quite work in this case. If the defensive guy was countering all night long the judges could give the round to him
     
  4. renyo

    renyo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,417
    332
    Jul 21, 2007
    Floyd is certainly not a prime Pea.:deal
     
  5. sosolid4u09

    sosolid4u09 4 8 15 16 23 42 banned Full Member

    12,433
    3
    Jun 21, 2008
    yea but pimpC has done the same, except backing mayweather. Which is fine. Pac vs Floyd inevitably ends up being the focal point of nearly every thread on esb nowadays :lol::lol: thats why i want to SEE THE DAMM FIGHT HAPPEN


    Like i said floyd vs pac doesnt isnt what i mean by offense vs defense. Both guys have far more dimensions to their game.
     
  6. Offense wins. For an overly extreme explanation:


    Imagine Offensive Fighter throws 200 punches in a round and lands 10. Defensive Fighter throws 5 punches and lands 2, while avoiding 190.

    Who wins the round?
     
  7. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
    I know right? I mean considering he has 41 wins and a 61% KO ratio it is very likely. :roll:

    Come on Big Tone! :lol:
     
  8. Leon

    Leon The Artful Dodger Full Member

    40,234
    13
    Mar 14, 2010
    soslid4u09, this is why your thread sucks. People end up making the concepts too ideal for reality.
     
  9. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
    Right, he is better. :lol:
     
  10. sosolid4u09

    sosolid4u09 4 8 15 16 23 42 banned Full Member

    12,433
    3
    Jun 21, 2008
    lets make this interesting! Opinions seem to be quite polarised on this one! Added a Poll to it now. Please vote
     
  11. sosolid4u09

    sosolid4u09 4 8 15 16 23 42 banned Full Member

    12,433
    3
    Jun 21, 2008
    lol my bad. I guess i didnt word my q properly. Was just interested what guys think about the whole offense vs defense thing! Didnt mean for it to get this technical and rigorous
     
  12. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,041
    35,127
    Jun 23, 2005
    PBF has the best defesne in boxing since a prime Pea Whitaker period.:deal And some may argue even better because he doesn't put himself out of position for the counter like Pea did.:deal
     
  13. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
    First to vote!

    Well if we say boxing is punching AND defending. All things being equal the guy who can defend better will win or will have the longer career in general so would win a rematch.

    Guys who are masters of defense may lose, but guys who are masters of offense are usually destroyed. The reason for this is that if the defensive guy fights a fighter with better offense? He can lose "comfortably" relying on his defense or just wait for spots. If the offensive fighter is out gunned? It will get really ugly. Game over.
     
  14. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,041
    35,127
    Jun 23, 2005
    Horrible analogy. It would be much better and more realistic if you said Offensive fighter throws 60 punches in a round and lands 15

    Defensive fighter throws 40 punches in the round and lands 25

    Who wins the round? My scenario is much more likely than yours.:deal:hi:
     
  15. sosolid4u09

    sosolid4u09 4 8 15 16 23 42 banned Full Member

    12,433
    3
    Jun 21, 2008
    Another thing is, if you look through history, the greatest fighters ever never had a crazily high KO %, suggesting that most weren't simply mad offensive fighters, but must have possessed considerable defensive skills aswel