Agreed. Roosters would be 10-0and have a for and against of 500-0 of it wasn't for poor refereeing and players scoring from "lucky" kicks.:!:
Mead played 3 games on the wing where he rarely got involved. Ya know what they say about wingers? They're people that hang out with footballers. :yep John won a premiership with a broken jaw as a prop forward in a much more ruthless era in terms of player safety. He also went on to give his missus five 2 hour orgasms with his tongue the next morning.:yep
did you watch the game? I was there and the refs were doing a poor job of keeping the storm onside and letting them slow the play the ball all night long. then there was the Billy slater Knock on 5mins from half time where the touchie called knockon but the ref overruled it and let billy run 20m because our boys stopped cos they thought it was there ball, then in the same set storm knocked on again but then it was called play on and 6 again, then they put up a bomb where Jennings was clearly held back from contesting it and they scored on half time to make it 18 - 12. if the first knockon (WHICH WAS A NO BRAINER) was called CORRECTLY we would have had a full set in there 10, worst case scenario is we go to half time 12 - 12, or we score and its 18 - 12 our way, We only lost by a try and 2 penalty goals (which were suspect) so that 1 call is a game changer. the favoritism to the storm is disgraceful , they bend the rules all night long and get away with it. They played well melbourne, but that doesnt justify the complete crap the refs dished out on us last night, I got back to the car and turned on 2GB and heard caller after caller complaining about the refs, and the call team agreed the refs were bad last night.
Must have been busy giving out free tickets through the week plus the goosters up to their old tricks of counting legs rather than people
I didnt see a second of it, but I'm certain Melbourne were the better team an won fair and square. You whinge at the standard of refereeing every single game. Show me one article that says the Roosters were robbed and I'll concede defeat.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-05-25/nrl-round-11-wrap/4713152 "Billy Slater appeared to knock the ball on twice in the lead-up to Cameron Smith's 40th-minute try which put the visitors ahead 18-12 on the stroke of half-time." --------------------------------------------------------- http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-new...s-robinson-20130526-2n4ra.html?skin=text-only "The try provoked the ire of the crowd of 19,164 after both Billy Slater and Cooper Cronk appeared to knock-on in the lead-up." --------------------------------------------------------- http://www.sportal.com.au/league-news-display/roosters-wiser-for-storm-loss-236823 "But a controversial try to Cameron Smith right on half-time, where Billy Slater appeared to knock on earlier in the tackle count, swung the game back in the Storm's favour." --------------------------------------------------------- http://www.theaustralian.com.au/spo...-state-of-origin/story-fnca0von-1226650580665 "But much to the disgust of the crowd of 19,164, Billy Slater appeared to knock the ball on twice in the lead-up to Cameron Smith's 40th-minute try which put the visitors ahead 18-12 on the stroke of halftime." --------------------------------------------------------- Melbourne were prob the better team, but we did not get a fair shake all damn game, and that 1 try before half time really made the world of difference
They were robbed?? They shouldn't have even got last the first finals game against the Tigers. That bull**** scrum was one of the worst infringements I've ever seen and the ref let it go. The El Masri iffy double movement try in the 2004 GF may be a fair shout.