I agree with you!:good Anyone want to add their support to this plan? It's very simple and yet...because there are 50 of them, and because we nominate them...it should provide for very good results!
indeed! huggers and haters are not likely to be nominated by more than a few...so they would not make top 50.
Everyone has some bias and many will call it hating/hugging, whatever!! Its the spice of life, I suppose:yep I'd like to see such a process.
Isn't 50 slightly too many though? Just imagine the poor guy who has to collate all the info - 50 list for each weightclass +p4p - every month!!! Wouldn't 25 be enough, whilst still not being too few?
Happy medium of 30-40 seems like the likely outcome here. 25 may not be enough and 50 is alot when you think about it. Just Type Like This And Imagine Well you get the drift....imagine 50 names and then ALL their lists for what, 18 weight classes?
let's go with 33 then...we have to be realistic! These guys might be glad to be on the committee...but when they have to do all that work - if someone decides one month not to keep it going - it's a blig flop! I think an odd number is better, in case we get draws...this should sort that one out! 33 anyone?
OK.... I'm not trying to be difficult:nono I just think a larger list lends more credibility, 30-40 is fine. Though I imagine that one could create an Excel spreadsheet, which once set up, would make it just a matter of typing in the results.
...anyone who thinks that we shouldn't elect 33 committee members "The ESB 33" by nominations, each poster - one nomination, top 33 most nominated to become "The ESB 33" for one year, when the nominations process is repeated, with" The ESB 33" being responsible for ranking the top 10 contenders in each weightclass as well as the top 10 p4p, each month?... ...speak NOW, or forever hold your tongue!:deal