Official ESB Rankings -- Vote Now

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Lampley, Sep 12, 2007.


  1. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    I agree with you!:good

    Anyone want to add their support to this plan?

    It's very simple and yet...because there are 50 of them, and because we nominate them...it should provide for very good results!
     
  2. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    There won't be many haters or huggers in there anyways because of nominations.
     
  3. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    indeed! huggers and haters are not likely to be nominated by more than a few...so they would not make top 50.
     
  4. C Money

    C Money Paul McCloskey Full Member

    7,839
    0
    Feb 8, 2007
    Everyone has some bias and many will call it hating/hugging, whatever!! Its the spice of life, I suppose:yep

    I'd like to see such a process.
     
  5. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    Isn't 50 slightly too many though? Just imagine the poor guy who has to collate all the info - 50 list for each weightclass +p4p - every month!!!

    Wouldn't 25 be enough, whilst still not being too few?
     
  6. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    Happy medium of 30-40 seems like the likely outcome here.

    25 may not be enough and 50 is alot when you think about it.

    Just
    Type
    Like
    This
    And
    Imagine

    Well you get the drift....imagine 50 names and then ALL their lists for what, 18 weight classes?
     
  7. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    let's go with 33 then...we have to be realistic! These guys might be glad to be on the committee...but when they have to do all that work - if someone decides one month not to keep it going - it's a blig flop!

    I think an odd number is better, in case we get draws...this should sort that one out!

    33 anyone?
     
  8. C Money

    C Money Paul McCloskey Full Member

    7,839
    0
    Feb 8, 2007
    OK.... I'm not trying to be difficult:nono :lol:

    I just think a larger list lends more credibility, 30-40 is fine.

    Though I imagine that one could create an Excel spreadsheet, which once set up, would make it just a matter of typing in the results.
     
  9. C Money

    C Money Paul McCloskey Full Member

    7,839
    0
    Feb 8, 2007
    Ok by me
     
  10. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    33?

    has a nice look to it...
     
  11. C Money

    C Money Paul McCloskey Full Member

    7,839
    0
    Feb 8, 2007
    :yep
     
  12. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    Yah, could even give it name or something :lol::lol::lol: Like Oceans 11:deal

    Nominations for the ESB 33!!
     
  13. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    ...anyone who thinks that we shouldn't elect 33 committee members "The ESB 33" by nominations, each poster - one nomination, top 33 most nominated to become "The ESB 33" for one year, when the nominations process is repeated, with" The ESB 33" being responsible for ranking the top 10 contenders in each weightclass as well as the top 10 p4p, each month?...

    ...speak NOW, or forever hold your tongue!:deal
     
  14. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    12,906
    6,252
    Jun 30, 2005
  15. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    12,906
    6,252
    Jun 30, 2005