***official pac hater's excuses after mabs brutal defeat***

Rule the World??atsch WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT??? hes #2 in the world, people think so by an enormous Majority.

Translation, Alot of people a(Majority) thinks PAC is the second best fighter in the WORLD, yes better than any prime fighters he will eventually fight.

Its not matter of ruling the world he and PBF are ON TOP of the food chain, there is nothing to defend.:huh

There are people out there who know far more ...FAR MORE boxing than you and me will ever know that thinks PAC is the man. There is nothing to defend.

If you come out talking like ohh PAC is this and that, you'll look foolish more often than not. Yeah Guzman WHO??? theres a reason no one knows him, he aint that good?

 

so yeah, mab's best version ever was right after the two losses to jones but his best period of his career was right before he met pac. agreed?

 

Nothing you said meant anything. Pac isn't the only one who can do what you said. In fact, he isn't the only one doing it. Have you seen Cotto lately? Did you miss Pavlik this Saturday?

Oh...BTW, you're right, 4 years ago, MAB was still NEAR his prime. Never said otherwise.

You didn't answer my question. Was Hopkins PRIME at 37 and 39 yrs old?

 

i also agree that EM should have won that but mab was thoroughly outboxed? you have to pick better words black. EM did not school mab in that fight

 

No one knew Hopkins before he fought Trindad....was he not that good? No one knew Pacman before he fought MAB, was he not that good?

You know exactly what I am talking about. Don't play dumb. Where did I say I rank Pacman P4P?

Anyone that doesn't say Pacman is great and can do anything a Pacman fan says he can, is labled a Hater. PacDbest originally called me this in our original conversation when he was comparing Pacman to Duran.

 

That is what I have been saying all along. He certainly accomplished more later on. He had a great stretch that culminated with a win over Hamed and Morales.

BTW, I thought MAB won the FIRST Morales fight, and not the 2nd one. His style had changed and I thought it cost him in the 2nd one. MAB going to war in the mid 90's was better than his technical style of the 00's. But he can't do that anymore for long periods.

 

:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

 

We are not asking for validation for PACs greatness, hes already again on TOP!!!, Millions, Billions know it..Actually its common knowledge..

Its this prevailing malaise of degrading an opponent before the fight so that one cannot get any credit.

Trust me and you KNOW MORE MORE MILES MORE Than me. Guzman, Soto, Valero, when Pac fights these "prime" fighters.. you'll wish for an Old MAB and Erik back


NO One knows Hopkins before he fought Trinidad????:rofl :rofl :rofl atsch who????

I give up

 

Either of you gonna stop cheering each other to false victory long enough to answer the questions? Or are simply going to ignore anything that proves your little thesis wrong?

Was Hopkins in his prime at age 37? Yes or No?

 

Barrera being old and way way past his best is not an excuse, its a fact

 

quit it while you still can man. this people will be chestbumpin each other till they get you crazy.

 

Do you dare claim that people outside the boxing public knew who Bernard Hopkins was before he fought Trinidad? Is this your claim?

BILLIONS know who Pacman is Billions don't even watch this sport. They certainly don't know who Pacman, Mayweather, Hatton, or anyone else is.

 

Did you just call Hopkins a runner?

Either way, you say Hopkins was not in his prime at age 37. You just agreed to this. Yet by your logic, because MAB was at his highest p4p ranking when he fought Pacman, he has to be prime.

Well, Hopkins highest P4P ranking.....he was 37. And you just said he wasn't prime. So there goes THAT logic.