***official pac hater's excuses after mabs brutal defeat***

I actually think it's funny now. It used to be antagonizing. But they have used it so much that now everyone knows they only do it cuz they can't win an argument on their own merits.

 

Casual boxing fans know Hopkins before Trinidad. Make a poll ..It'll make you look good:good Billions is an exageration, an embellishment.

Millions are more accurate, and alot of those millions certainly know more boxing than me ..Maybe not you:hi:

 

Of course they did. And casual boxing fans know Guzman. Make poll. :deal

 

:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

In other words, your logic was proven false (as usual) and now you don't want to have it brought up again. All you kept saying was "MAB was #3 by Ring so he was in his prime"..."It was his highest ranking by Ring".

Now that it's proven that a high ranking by Ring doesn't indicate prime, you resort to insults.

How do you determine that MAB was in his prime then? You kept saying it was because of Ring. So if not Ring, then what? Prime and elite are different things. Never once did I say MAB wasn't elite. I said he wasn't prime

Oh, and while you're at it, can you please quote where I said Ring having MAB at #3 was wrong? Take your time.

 

You're too smart Bye the way PAC by KO..:deal

dont ****in go in the ring old and not prime or else you'll get badly beaten

and Pac fans hate to see a man get raped in the ring

but we will be celebrating mightily at the carnage:happy :happy :happy go PAC:rofl :rofl :rofl :hi:

 

He better win by KO. I have money on it. Pacman KO 9th round. No skin off my back and money in my pocket.

 

Don't care about Bhop.

I'm talking about the Present 126 & 130 pounder, Nobody among them Dominates Opponents ,Greats or Not, like Pac.

You named my Fav Cotto & Kelly but they haven't fight Great(ATG or HOF bound) Fighters yet. Cotto will have one in his next fight with Mosley but I doubt if he can win that fight like How Pac dominates MAB & EM.

 

Nah, you're name calling and thats fine by me.

MAB went back up because he won some more fights. That doesn't mean he was prime. Hopkins lost to Taylor and then went back up by winning againt in his 40's. He still wasn't prime :deal

They are parallels. Anyone with a semblance of intelligence can see what I am saying. This excludes you.

PBF could lose tomorrow and still be in his prime. His style hasn't changed, he hasn't physically slown down. If he wins every fight until he is 35, it doesn't mean he is still prime at 35. Just means no one can beat him.

 

Good. I don't care about Pacman:deal

I am talking about MAB and whether he was prime or not at what point in his career. Notice I didn't say he was suddenly not prime when PACMAN beat him. I said he wasn't prime when he beat Hamed. Which is well before that fight took place. You are making this about Pacman, not me.

Lots of fighters dominate in their weight classes. Valero has been dominant. But as I have told you a 1000 times. KO's aren't the only way to dominate. More noticable? Yup....more dominant than a 120-108 decision? Nope. Styles buddy. Styles.

Either way....gotta go. Halo 3 calls. Pacman KO MAB 8th round. Peace.

 

I'm not gonna go Dirty with you KG. Johnco already make it simply for you but you still don't get it. MAB was top 3 P4P when Pac beat him the first time. Even The Geico Caveman can understand that. Why can't you????