Official result or your own scores ? Which takes precedent when ranking boxers ?

:good

 

MAG will only reply with a post which is as long as The Hitman Hearns' arms and as cringing as The Hitman Hatton's excuses for ducking Junior Witter, so I'm out of here on that note.

 

oh my, I'm not even gunna look! But yeah I remember that well, what a legend he is hahahaha

 

I rememebr you posting in it Cuchulain when you kept telling him I'd posted a list in the lists thread, and that other poster kept posting madness in there and I was giving him loads of abuse, what a thread

 

Yeah lol that ***** kept saying "broken record" haha.

Made me cringe reading that thread when mag was comparing duran and hagler to virgil hill

 

Clearly in my the world, the most important, as there is no official standard for judgement. But it is recognized, that other people have opinion, so peer pressure to varying degree's also affects the judgement.

 

You are not a professional judge.

What you are suggesting is that if you believe you have illness A, and a Doctor tells you, you have illness B; you will take the medicine for illness A, because you think you are right.

 

Yeah and holyfield drawing with lewis was the correct result and good for boxing yada yada yada

 

The fact the fight happened nearly 15 years ago, and still gets regularly brought up, would suggest that could be so...

 

:rofl

and yes SOMETIMES doctors do talk ****, like when they tell you a genital wart will recur yet it hasn't flared up in over four years

Lufcrazy ended this thread.

 

It's all in the game.

 

like EA Sports?

 

My own decision/rating of the fight because I've never been offered bribes to bias my decision unlike some fight judges

 

I was thinking more like the wire