Official: UFC Not A Monoply

Discussion in 'MMA Forum' started by Will Cooling, Jan 31, 2012.


  1. Will Cooling

    Will Cooling Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,170
    0
    Aug 2, 2010
    http://espn.go.com/mma/story/_/id/7...-ufc-strikeforce-purchase-take-further-action

    Not a surprise if you knew what you were talking about.
     
  2. Haggis McJackass

    Haggis McJackass Semi-neutralist Overseer Full Member

    5,126
    1
    Jul 20, 2004
    But...... but....... the UFC is by far the biggest promotion, therefore an evil monopoly that will ruin everything. :bart

    :hat
     
  3. BobDigi5060

    BobDigi5060 East Side MMA Full Member

    10,898
    2
    Feb 7, 2006
    This content is protected
     
  4. Ai-edy2007

    Ai-edy2007 STOCKTON 209 MOTHER****ER Full Member

    7,542
    0
    Apr 9, 2011
    +9000
     
  5. Will Cooling

    Will Cooling Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,170
    0
    Aug 2, 2010
    Sorry for raising the fact that an investigation frequently mentioned on the board has been concluded. I mistakenly thought that might be relevant.
     
  6. BobDigi5060

    BobDigi5060 East Side MMA Full Member

    10,898
    2
    Feb 7, 2006
    Not during the week leading up to UFC 143 :deal
     
  7. SouthpawSlayer

    SouthpawSlayer Im coming for you Full Member

    16,351
    2
    Sep 6, 2008
    so frequently mentioned that this is the first i have ever heard of it, you should really just pm this to this to the poster you are in conflict with and stop filling the forum up with pure shite 99% of us dont give a ****
     
  8. Will Cooling

    Will Cooling Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,170
    0
    Aug 2, 2010
    Yes. You're right. I shouldn't talk about the implications of the Strikeforce buyout - one of the biggest story's of last year - because you're not interested.

    If you don't want to read about then instead of bitching how about you just don't ****ing read it?
     
  9. scurlaruntings

    scurlaruntings ESB 2002 Club Full Member

    35,621
    12
    Jul 19, 2004
  10. SouthpawSlayer

    SouthpawSlayer Im coming for you Full Member

    16,351
    2
    Sep 6, 2008
    problem is you are making pointless threads that no one gives a **** about in the forum, we know about the SF buyout zuffa bought it and as you said it happened last year its done with great move by zuffa imo but thats it, i dont give a toss about the complications of it or the solicitors letters about it, you and another poster have a little back and fourth pety argument against 2 other posters, no one else cares of about 100 to 150 other posters on here, you seem to be under the impression that everyone here hates zuffa and what they do and its your right at every opportunity to defend zuffa, its pathetic. Most of us come here to talk about mma not whether or not zuffa violated section 7 of the fair trads commision or whatever BS it was. have a look back through your thread and count how many posters were happy and interested you posted this fascinating news story on MMA
     
  11. Will Cooling

    Will Cooling Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,170
    0
    Aug 2, 2010
    Please show me these pointless threads I've created.

    NB: Actually to save you the task I went through quickly myself. The last thread I started was on December 4th to publicize a magazine I had an article in and the one before that was to start the discussion about GSP-Diaz being off. So you are completely out of line and I think you owe me an apology.

    On your broader points no I do not think that everyone is interested in this topic, that's why I didn't force anyone to read it. It is however a big story and worthy of bringing to people's attention. That's why ESPN, MMA Fighting, Sherdog and MMA Junkie have all picked it up. I do not think that everyone on here hates Zuffa nor do I think everything they do is brilliant. Why you have felt the need to resort to these lies because somebody dared to post something you weren't interested in is beyond me.
     
  12. SouthpawSlayer

    SouthpawSlayer Im coming for you Full Member

    16,351
    2
    Sep 6, 2008
    ok only 1 pointless thread of late, but many pointless posts aimed at 1 or 2 other posters on here, it clogs up threads for the rest of us having to sift through that crap, this thread just capped it off, the PM ing service is there for a reason

    an apology :lol: your a funny ****er
     
  13. Will Cooling

    Will Cooling Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,170
    0
    Aug 2, 2010
    Why would I PM a breaking news story? Surely the whole point of this board is to discuss breaking MMA news? And if two people disagree on a matter of substance then why would they start PM'ing - again surely having that discussion is the point of the discussion board? You accuse me of only caring about a couple of posters but you seem to be saying that if it doesn't directly interest you it shouldn't be posted.

    Sigh.

    I will in future try to ensure that everyone I post only interests you. Wouldn't want you to suffer the agony of having to scroll down past something that doesn't immediately grab your attention.
     
  14. Ne5ville14

    Ne5ville14 Rationalist by default... Full Member

    8,629
    0
    Mar 14, 2010
    I only have 2 or 3 comment about this whole story....

    The UFC isn't a monopoly the same way Monsanto doesn't have a monopoly on soy and corn in the U.S.

    If a judgement have been passed we don't have any choice but respect it...the same way that [ame="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Food_libel_laws"]food libel laws[/ame] must be respected in the U.S.


    And as a last comment
    This content is protected
     
  15. Will Cooling

    Will Cooling Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,170
    0
    Aug 2, 2010
    Quite. I'm not sure if the UFC is a de facto monopoly and I certainly think its got to the extent that collective bargaining is needed to stop it screwing over fighters, but the idea put forward by some that the government was going to intervene was always a non-starter.