Official verdicts every single one disagrees with

It would be really hard to find any fight that everyone agreed with unless it was not remotely competitive.
Because people have biases in all directions.

I watched Foreman vs. Briggs at the time, & it from the pre-fight feature & then looking at the result, it really seemed like their was a loving fix or benign conspiracy-to get George to retire.

This website has folks score fights-I have never seen a "controversy rating" higher quite as high as this one, 79%.
When 2 of the judges have it a 4 point spread in favor of Shannon, & not one reviewer has that high a disparity, you know something was wrong with those "inexperienced' judges. Corruption or not.

Interestingly, like the other referee, our own McGrain has it a draw there. [url]https://eyeonthering.com/boxing/george-foreman-vs-shannon-briggs[/url]

 

Totally agree. I like Famechon but he lost that first one.

 

Tyson-Spinks was a clear robbery.

 

Vito Antuofermo vs Marvin Hagler 1

 

I’ll second Nelson v French 1

I’ll also throw in Leonard v Hearns II.

And for the old timers, Fitz v Sharkey I, if we flex and define the DQ as a verdict.

 

You won't find any argument on that one. Good mention.

 

I've never seen a guy score Snipes over Coetzee even given near everyone scores it via the wrong system.

 

In his book Oscar said Sturm beat him,thats pretty compelling ,imo