We get them all the time on the boards One i have issues with are the people who insult posters for calling a certain boxer a coward Yeah yeah we get it. Any boxer who steps into the ring is braver than most out there. Even Audley But talk about missing the point You compare top level famous boxers with OTHER top level famous boxers, not with the average layman off the street Bravery is one of the highest attributes that can be bestowed on a boxer It's what will forever separate the best of the best Pacquiao Mayweather Jones Calzaghe 4 of the p4p best boxers of the past twenty years yet shameless cherry pickin cowards each one of them :fire:fire:fire Did i just insult 4 of the most popular boxers on the board? LOL im gonna get a flaming. But its true Cotto, Froch, Marquez, Morales, Bradley It's guys like these who show us just what boxing can - and my Laaaawwd should be about - elite cream of the crop guys themselves, but who spent their entire careers actively seeking out the very hardest challenges out there, and in the process giving us - the paying fan - the fights we REALLY wanted to see
Yeah calling any boxer a coward is stupid but it can't be denied that some are braver than others. One of the boxing cliches that really baffles me is "you have to take the belt from the champion". You'd think winning more rounds than the champion would suffice but apparently not.
"boring" - I can understand this from casuals, but from supposed boxing fans, it's just ignorant. And it's always from haters or fans whose idols just got beat. merry x-mas to all even *******s
"At this point, it's who wants it more" Could it be that, one guy has a little more stamina? One guy has more talent? Did Ali really "want it" more than Frazier in Manila. I remember Sugar Ray Leonard saying this cliche during Chavez-Taylor 1? Chavez wanted it more? How do we measure that?
that one baffles me as well This one's a little more ambiguous Wlad - booooooooooooooooooooooooring Rigondeux - no real boxing fan could call a Rigo vs another great fighter boring. He's one of the best pure boxers of all time, and he's active in our era :good
" It could have gone either way " FFS, give us your scorecard, if you can't decide then what is "Draw" there for ?
YDKSAB - I hate when people use that ****, its so corny and automatically makes me think that the person is a ******ed fanboy who doesn't know what they're talking about. If you disagree with somebody then say why with a reasoned well thought out and logical response instead of hiding behind that crap. Robbery - The phrase is often used needlessly when a close fight doesn't go the way they wanted it to. Exposed - No fighter can take an L without being 'exposed'. Nobody ever just gets beat by the better guy or bested in a close fight - its always 'exposed'.
"Robbery" When fanboys of certain fighters claim robbery on close fights. Close, competitive fight with some hard to score rounds? Sure. Robbery? GTFO and take the loss. The ******ed fanboys don't know the difference between a real robbery and what they think it is. Some boxers have a history of claiming robbery themselves which makes them look like whining cry babies and this behavior trickles down to their fanboys. The boxers should be questioning their trainers instead for telling them that they are winning and to be conservative when all the official and unofficial scorecards are razor close.
That baffled me for a long time too. Now I take it to mean rounds where there isn't a clear winner go to the champion.