OG Frank Warren schools AJ bumboy Tony Bellew

What Warren did for British boxing is one of the largest reasons it's booming today.

But he's a Video Cassette, that's now trying to break into the DVD age without realising that is now the past too.


Saunders is his greatest active earner.....

The second he lost a purse bid to Andrade, Warren must have realised how desperate the situation is for him.


Saunders/Fury getting shots at Canelo/GGG and Joshua is the only way I see him keeping his foot in the doorway.

 

No contracts were sent for those fights. Eddie just announced on twitter his offers to denonaty wilder. Only this 15 million contract has he bothered to send over a contract AFTER Wilder accepted and still he is on record saying he wasn't sure if he did or didn't send over the contract.

No boxing promoters send contracts first, because that is usually done afterwards when the other party has agreed to an offer to proceed with negotiations. It was a slimy lie peddled by Hearn to delude his fanboys that contracts are sent out first openly for the public to, along with proof of funds, or else it is unreasonable to expect the offer to be accepted.

He played his viewers like a fiddle and got them into believing a lie which most of the parrot off like lemmings.

Barry Hearn also said in no uncertain terms that he'd like Joshua to avoid Wilder until he could milk his fans a bit longer.

 

Maybe in the North.....

 

I don't need to only take Warren's word on it.

Eddies own son Carl Froch already confirmed that he is the problem. Is he a liar too?

This content is protected

 

Well you clearly saw the end of the video where Hearn explains that they all agreed to take the fight on on the terms they wanted for September and terms to which Wilder accepted.

 

Didn't you get Froch's joke?


"It's always Eddie's fault".....

 

That's your problem you take everything Eddie says as gospel. Whatever lies Eddie told at the end of the video, can easily be exposed.

Why did he then say he couldn't do September after Wilder agreed terms and tell him only April is avaliable? And why did he adding in the clause that Wilder would not be entitled to a rematch but Jenner would if he was determined for his offer to be accepted?

And why couldn't Hearn offer Wilder a percentage which is all he asked from the get go? Why did Parker get a percentage and why did he get 50/50 for klitschko fight when AJ's best win was over Charles Martin?

 

Froch spent nearly 10 minutes to explain a joke?

Go away , you can't debate. You're as dishonest and slimy as your daddy Eddie.

 

Yet you are taking what Warren says as gospel.

Wilder sat on a contract for 4 weeks. You snooze you lose. AJ had a mandatory to fill and waiting for Wilder to pick up pen wasn't an option. Wilder had enough time to sign the contract and didn't. He only piped up once AJ v Povetkin was nearly done.

The clause is simply the benefit of being the A side. The A side calls the shots.

He got 50/50 v Klitchko as AJ sold out Wembley and brought record UK PPV buy numbers.

The money for AJ v Klitchko was generated by a huge margin from Joshua. No doubt he deserved 50/50 as he was and still is the money man of the division.

 

No I'm placing what he has to say alongside what others have said, including AJ himself who was taking the offer seriously ''I will not sell my soul for 50 million '' Froch, Barry Hearn, Shelly Finkel(who has a history of securing bigger and better deals than Eddie), Evander Holyfield,Fury, Miller, Lennox Lewis, the list goes on.

Meanwhile the notorious compulsive liar Eddie Hearn is meant to be the only person who is telling truth when it has been established that he has blatantly lied about contracts, emails, 1 billion dollar deals and offers during this entire saga.

 

He also backpedaled rather fast when Kugs said he was telling Eddie what he said and Eddie showed up in the frame, big 180 from Froch. But you know Hearn haters, the stopped the clip right where it suited their agenda

 

I'm a human lie detector, and Frank Warren is bullshitting here, I'm afraid to say.

It is very subtle, but when he says "There was a contract, I've seen it" his voice goes up an octave. Sometimes as well, the devil is in the detail, when Bellew asks how he's seen it, Warren has to think quickly, he pauses and ers, then says he works with Shelley Finkel. Now Bellew has just insinuated to Warren that he is lying live on air, but if you notice, Warren doesn't actually give any detail as to how he's seen it, like for example, did Finkel pass a copy to him over lunch, were they were having coffee at Starbucks, perhaps it was emailed to him, or maybe it was looked at in one of these guy's offices? This is the kind of detail that most people would want to give when someone has just made a sideways accusation that you might be lying.

Warren is a good liar, but not quite good enough.