OG Frank Warren schools AJ bumboy Tony Bellew

Go and get your ears tested or give them a good clean. There's no ''pauses or er's'' from Warren - he responds promptly, confidently and concisely.

It's Bellend who has to back track and twist to insinute that Warren is somehow done something wrong for seeing the contract, by stating it should be confidential.

 

I admit that your civilian ears will find it it difficult to pick up these subtleties, especially if you've already picked a dog in this fight, but one thing that is undeniable is that Warren avoided giving an approximate time, date, or location when pressed on how he'd seen it. He didn't give a bad answer by any means, especially as he had to think on his feet, and it was smart of him to be a bit vague to avoid the potential of getting tripped up later, but if he was telling the truth he would have likely volunteered a bit more detail considering what Bellew is insinuating there with his question.

 

It's a possibility. Belles had an account on boxrec "Bomber1" or something. It's confirmed him tho lol

 

You seem to be forgetting Bellew and Warren had heat. Warren tried to sue Bellew when he signed to matchroom.

 

Not the same at all. Warren tried to mess with Bellew's money. That's far worse than someone ripping into Bellew verbally.

Now of course Bellew could be shook of fury. I don't deny that.

 

Tony needs a thread dedicated to the stupid **** he says.

 

Bellew is scum.
He's the worst type off asskisser imaginable, a lapdog and lackey for his master.
He's the kind of personality that you just shouldn't trust. He'd do anything to further himself with his masters.

I can't believe he's given such air time as a boxing pundit.

I will give Eddie Hearn some credit though, he's done well to sell such a mediocrity as Bellew as a top fighter. That's probably why Bellew sold his soul to be Hearn's pet pitbull-poodle.
Although it's doubtful Bellew had a soul to begin with.

And if anyone thinks I'm being harsh on Bellew, no, I'm not.
It's just a fact someone has to be the scum of the earth.
Nothing personal but it just happens to be Tony Bellew.

 

This content is protected

Wilder Fanboys, do me a favour and watch the first 2 minutes of that.. FW being asked questions by a group of people.

When asked if Fury was offered 50 million he says he can't discuss money/purses because a Confidentiality clause, EXCUSE ME? PARDON? WHAT?

All this talk of Hearn and AJ, money, splits, apparently him seeing contracts but he had to sign or insisted on a CONFIDENTIALITY CLAUSE?

Mr W, surely you'd want your amazing deal to be made public to expose what an idiot Hearn is and what Fury and Wilder will make without Joshua?

You seem to want to discuss "proof of funds" live on air you've apparently seen regarding Joshua/Wilder but can't discuss a fight you're apparently making?

Are you taking the pee?

I'll tell you why these people want clauses and won't speak about purses and money is because more than likely AJ Vs Povetkin blows these two out the water in terms of money LOL

Absolutely embarrassing, the fact FW, Team Wilder (all of them) want to discuss Hearn, AJ and money in EVERY INTERVIEW, EVERY TWEET and who offered what and "peasant money" and they are signing clauses so we the fans can't know the financials?

Also when one of them asked FW "Here or in the US"

FW replies he don't know yet.. Errrrr OK Was that the other 1% to be decided then? Is that all we are waiting for? Just the venue?

Superb, easy enough to decide, but how do they know the financials if they don't know where the fight is being held? Live gate? TV? Stuff like that, what time the fight is? PPV numbers move a lot depending on the time of a fight here and the US,


This is complete rubbish this is 99% done, no way, not if you can't tell us if it's the UK or US.

The more I hear the more I believe they are just doing this to try and force Hearn's hand, wrong game to play because in my opinion it just backfired spectacularly with "CONFIDENTIALITY CLAUSE".


Sorry Wilder Fanboys but I think you're being taken for a long ride.

 

Why are you so concerned with who's earning what?

Are you getting paid a cut from any of the agreements should they be disclosed?

Shouldn't you be more focused on if the fight is happening or not?

Matchroom has got you obsessed with fighter's purses. I don't remember boxing( from a fans pov) being about how much fighters are earning.

Those interested in this fight are not ''wilder fanboys'' they are boxing fans first and foremost, who want to see the best fight the best, not who has the largest purse or ppv's sold or how many tickets sold in their last fight, which all of you matchroom bent rent boys are obsessed with.

This fight blows that sham of fight with Povetkin out of the window. A fight where your boy is going to earn less than if he didn't duck Wilder.