A majority of Holyfield's losses were over the age of 40 after a long hard career full of wars. I would think a balanced opinion would not count those losses against Holyfield. Holyfield won plenty against notable names at Heavyweight ? Thomas, Dokes, Mercer, Douglas, Bowe, Tyson, Moorer, Holmes, Foreman, etc. Usyk's resume at Heavyweight isn't on the same level as Holyfield's and I think people are getting a bit too carried away. I'm a big fan of Usyk hes a great talent and definitely an ATG but rating him above Holyfield is crazy to me. Holyfield has so much more depth to his resume at Heavyweight.
The Bowe and Moorer losses matter. The way I see it is that Usyk has the best Cruiserweight resume. Holyfield has the better HW resume, but he took 3 bad losses. Losses that Usyk would never take. I can see Lewis beating Usyk, but Bowe and Moorer do not look good.
Sure, he clearly has more depth at Heavyweight. But he also has 6 losses and 2 draws, that should probably be 9 maybe even 10 losses... I'm not counting anything post-Byrd 2. That should be held against him.
I was working on my post, got distracted by something on YouTube, then came back and finished it and hadn't seen yours yet.
But still Usyk has no where the depth of Holyfield's Heavyweight resume. That's not Usyk's fault of course but it's still a fact Holyfield has many more notable wins at Heavyweight including 3 wins against ATGs Heavyweights Holmes, Tyson, Foreman. Ok Foreman and Holmes were old but still very competent fighters at that age rated amongst top 10.
Bowen and Tyson are indeed better NAMES, I don't think they're better wins. I agree he's not close to being the GOAT though.
The wins over Foreman and Holmes, while sure, they were all time greats, but to say they were both past prime, would be an understatement. They were both at least a decade past their primes. I would say AJ's wins over Wlad and Povetkin are comparable, but they're not, Wlad and Sasha were both far more dangerous opponents and far fresher.
Clearly his post AJ wins over Whyte and Hughie Fury, as well as his slugfest with Hunter, proved he had a little bit left in his tank. QUite frankly, without the Covid, which clearly badly damaged him, he would've most likely polished off Whyte in the rematch.
I don't. He has not fought enough to get any ATG HW accolades beyond being the best HW of his era. At LHW the same is true of Beterbiev. Theres just no getting around it. Its been a few days since the fight. People are overreacting like they do with everything.
The same should apply to Foreman he had some left. He was slower but had a better chin and endurance at this point + more power and he would put aj under more pressure. I personally don't see old Povetkin being more dangerous than old Foreman.... Old Foreman would have beaten that version
My point is Holyfield just has too much depth and too many quality names for Usyk to be rated above Holyfield at Heavyweight. I'm not hating on Usyk I'm just giving my honest opinion.
Fair point, I'll concede this argument. Still, I doubt even an old Povetkin would have lost to Tommy Morrison.
Sure, I get it. But when that depth include a ton of losses and controversial wins and draws. That's a massive dent against any fighter's argument that they should be considered an ATG.
Agree 100% with everything stated here. Usyk is indeed the most talented HW around, but he looks good against guys that just flat out cannot box. Michael Dokes, to just pick a random name from the past, would KO Usyk, never mind what he'd do to AJ, Fury, Parker or anyone else.