Ok if u got to Erase an L on a fighter, which loss and for what fighter??

Cotto to Margarito, not only for the handwraps contoversy but because he hasnt been the same since.

Ortiz to Maidana cause of all the unwarrented **** he got.

 

Klitschko would have finished Lewis off in second.
history would be flipped upside down


Andrey

 

calzaghe - i would take back that L from the amateurs in 1989, he was ****in robbed.

 

Cotto's beating by plaster boy.

 

:verysad

 

Oscar De La Hoya's loss against Tito

 

Joe even cried when he lost in his very first amateur fight...:yep...

 

I'm gonna go with Hamed/Barrerra too.

I'd rather that Hamed skipped that, fought one more fight and then retired undefeated.

 

DLH vs Trinidad....he should have won

i think someone said it though so i'd also have JMM-Pac

 

Duran -Leonard 2

But if that was taken away would Durans career would have led to his middleweight campaign?

 

Frazier/Foreman I.

 

That is terrible.
The only legit ATG match he had and you want to take away that from him - from the boxing fans?
I mean if it was like Cheato vs Cotto I fully support it. Makes perfect sense.

Hagler is my favorite but I would not take away his match vs SRL. Yes I would have rather seen them fight 3-5 years earlier. But no point in removing that defeat.


Douglas Tyson gets my vote.
If Tyson know how to handle his personal business, boxing history would be significantly be different.

 

I would say Hamed too, but the idiot was already on a downward spiral. If you spared him the Barrera fight, he would have gone on and lost to someone else. A removal of a single loss wouldn't help save Naz. You'd have to go 4 or 5 fights before that to drill some sense in to him.

So if I had to erase someone's loss, I'd definitely pick Cotto's against Margarito. That beating ruined him for life.

Another one would be Roy Jones' 1st loss (or even the 1st fight) against Tarver, and made him retire there and then.

Oh, and add Vargas' to Tito. As well as Tito's to Hopkins.