Ok if u got to Erase an L on a fighter, which loss and for what fighter??

De La Hoya Vs. Trinidad.

 

Tyson vs. Douglass - I don't think I need to explain this one.

 

Herol Graham/Julian Jackson.

 

Arguello vs Pryor I

 

co-sign

 

lol. As a hardcore Hamed fan, that fight is just impossible to watch. I cringe just thinking of it. I'd rather it didn't happen, but yeah, I get what you're trying to say.

Good point. Although, if given the choice, I'd choose to go back in time and make sure that Tyson never split with Rooney. Imo, that move was what marked the beginning of his downward spiral.

 

he quit. you dont quit. your corner tells you when you had enough not the other way around

 

Tyson 1st lost would change nothing the next guy would have beat him
the man stopped training for **** sake

he needed a father figure. one that he couldnt kick the **** out of

 

Yours..so u will be a "oser"..maybe zorritas dq though.

 

Disagree..i am the one receiving punches..so i quit if i cant take no mo'..

 

Very good point. The kid had just gone 6 rounds with a banger and got dropped twice, not seeming that bothered by the punches. However that cut worried him really badly and you can't train for that. I'll give the kid the benefit of the doubt.

On top of that I'd say de la Hoya - Mosley 2. A win over Mosley is better than a win over Tito, and everyone knows he beat Tito.

 

cotto loss to margo for the same reasons as the first guy

joe louis to rocky marciano - the government forced joe back inot boxing and gave rocky the biggest scalp of his unbeaten career when joe was well past it

 

My two are also: Tyson Vs Douglas, Hamed Vs Barrera

But.. like someone else said, had it not been those fights it would of been the next, just delaying the inevitable as it was their lifestyles/mental states that were screwing things up.

 

agreed

boxers arent machines ur mind and body tell u when enough is enough and cotto decided he had taken enough and had nothing else to give, why continue if he couldnt compete