No it's extraordinary to only you and a SPECIAL select few on here who can't grasp that it was near impossible for Wlad to unify all belts if the other dominate champion is his brother and other fighters swerved him when he had a small window to do it. You're so concerned about all belts yet the Foreman You are saying defeats Wlad only defended his belts 3 times ? If we are really using this angle and the FEW who sound like you are using it as proof Foreman wins bc Wlad wasn't undisputed or the clear number one in HIS era , well wouldn't that more apply to a far less dominating Foreman of HIS era ? You just keep exposing yourselves like fools because you don't like the fact a logical person isn't going to take Foreman here...they can't realistically if they were REALLY being honest which doesn't happen in this section often....you're living proof of that.. Lol
I can't say he had trouble with Briggs. He did beat Briggs clearly in my opinion. I do not remember the Savarese fight, I will have rewatch that one. Against Schultz, Foreman did have indeed trouble. However, let's face it Schultz had a better chin than Wlad and was moving all that the time unlike Wlad.Even though Wlad is a lot better than Schultz. It is also not suggested that Old Foreman was a better fighter than Wlad, because he was not.However, it remains doubtful that Wlad would be able to escape the Foreman power due to his fragile chin and stamina.Foreman just happens to have the right ingredients to make this a very tough fight for Wlad.
Old Foreman is still better than Ross Puritty, Lamon Brewster, or Corrie Sanders. If Wlad ran he would get tired and be stopped late. If Wlad tried to fight like a man which he wouldn't he would still be stopped by the same 48 year old Foreman who beat Shannon Briggs.
Old Foreman tossed one belt away to avoid Tony Tucker he tossed another away to avoid Axel Schulz. Old Foreman was a product of good match making. He would never fight Wlad in his comeback. Good thing he and his handlers knew more about him than people on this board.