Dempsey had fought about 100 exhibitions in the past six months, so it's not as if he hadn't stepped into a ring in years. He'd been doing well enough to convince him to take on a current contender.
Dempsey fought Smith twice he decisioned him over 4 rds, and kod him in 2 in the rematch. The fat midget you refer to [Meehan,] was a 4rd specialist and stood 5'9" he "schooled Langford over 4 rds too! And refused to fight Dempsey over a longer distance. That's not a theory you're espousing there ,it's a fairy tale.
Jeffries had fought three times that amount of exhibitions in the 18 months before he fought Johnson, he was boxing Fitz every night ,how did he look when he had a real fight? How about Louis when he came back after 2 years for Charles? Oh, and it was 42 exhibitions Dempsey had.
I stopped being in his prime at 23? After Firpo nearly took his head off him, Miske beat him, Meehan beat him, Fireman Sam knocked him into next week. Yes he turned down a title shot there because he knew he couldn't beat Tunney but he was back in the ring at 37 against a ranked opponent trying to win a title shot against Sharkey who he'd already beat. Or a real tale of many losses. I forgot the Miske loss (some accounts) before Miske's terminal illness
You cleary stated Wills wasn't prime. Don't know why everyone is so angry. I'm just going by styles, I think Wills suits Dempsey. Also to compare a fighter coming back fighting exhibitions to a fighter that is active in live bouts is apples to Oranges. Can't compare the Levinskey bout to the Wills Sharkey/Uzcudon bouts.
Look, bottom line is that Rickard and Kearns did not want their tiger to get in the ring w Wills even with big money around for it .. I'm sure Dempsey would have fought Wills but he did not demand it either .. he was not exactly Patterson bucking management to fight Liston ..
No, his prime stopped at 27, after the Firpo fight,because he then had 3 years out of the ring, and was never the same fighter again. So Dempsey knew he couldn't beat Tunney when he was 32, but he thought he could come back and beat Sharkey when he was 37 after 4 and a half years without a fight? Makes sense:think Dempsey fought Miske three times ,they drew the first ,Dempsey won a decision in the second ,and he ko'd Miske in the third. Apart from obviously hating Dempsey,which is your prerogative, I don't really see what you are so desperately reaching for here?
I dont think that the available footage backs Wills up very well, but I am certain that he was a lot better than the available footage implies. A Wills boxed set, would tell you a hell of a lot!
It was at least 80 according to this. All those exhibitions ought to have kept him in reasonable shape. He was old, sure, but hardly inactive and rusty. And how did Louis look at age 37? Would you use his performance against Marciano as a gauge for how he might fare against a prime Mike Tyson? If Wills has his performances as a 38 year old held against him, then I don't see why Dempsey should get a pass for Levinsky.
He shouldn't and I agree with you .. Prior to Kingfish Dempsey had been touring for quite a while and having a ton of exhibitions .. he did;t just reappear ..
You could mount an argument that he tried to fight Wills, but was blocked by the evil boxing commissions.