Mercifully for the WBC, 2006 was actually a better-than-average year as their title was fought for 3 times. Rahman-Toney, Rahman-Maskaev, Maskaev-Okhello. Rahman was a busier champion than either Vitali or Maskaev, naturally. So they probably did alright out of that. But with just 1 title fight in 2005 and probably 2007, that's really going to hit the WBC in the wallet...
What does that matter? Just because most people thought he was the best doesn't make it so until he proves it in the ring. Vitali had more fans. So what. There were 3 other "World Champions" at the time, one of whom had defeated Vitali (Byrd). Maskaev does not deserve to be Emeritus champ, and neither did Vitali.
Perhaps Vitlay could have his status changed to "Peoples Emeritus Champion" after all, he apparently became the "Peoples champion" after LOSING to Lewis. And now, I read somewhere else that Wald is the "Peoples champion" now. If I was Vitlay, I'd be asking my brother how he's got the cheek to take one of my titles from me.......
Can someone verify Maskaev's injuries? If he has four herniated discs in his back there's no "Emeritus" bullsht only back operations, traction, pain pills, therapy, retirement. I can see a Peter/Povetkin super fight in 2 years!
Retirement = Emeritus if the guy retired as champ. That's the whole point. Same reason they gave it to Lewis. (who to be honest, if the Emeritus thing HAS to exist - which it shouldn't - is the only one so far deserving of it.)