Simple question, but I'd like more than simple answers. I've been on a bit of a Olivares bend lately. Can a distinction be made between the two, is it impossible because of Olivare's quick decline due to living fast? Any and all discussion welcome.
Pound-For-Pound, I think that Ruben Olivares was a greater fighter than Alexis Arguello. Olivares, a fairly short fighter and a natural bantamweight, gave Arguello, a very tall featherweight, fits before being stopped in a late round. Also keep in mind that Olivares was past his peak while Arguello was in his prime at the time. During his prime years, Olivares who was a tremendous offensive machine with terrific punching power, a fact which overshadowed his fine boxing skills. He literally dominated the bantamweight division at a time when there were a number of other fine fighters at that weight. But Olivares did have a tendency to not keep his nose to the grindstone when it came to training. Olivares was a more versatile fighter than another dominant Mexican bantamweight, the much taller Carlos Zarate. Like Oliveras, Zarate was a terrific offensive fighter with lots of punching power. Zarate also was a far more dedicated fighter than Olivares. But Zarate was cruelly exposed when Wilfredo Gomez absolutely demolished him. Zarate simply could not cope with Gomez. During his prime, Olivares was never overwhelmed in that manner unless he neglected his training. - Chuck Johnston
Arquello's real prime probably started at Superfeather. Review those two bloodbaths with grossly underrated Alfredo Escalera for the WBC title. Arquello took away Escalera's title in Escalera's home country of Puerto Rico....and was professional enough to give Alfredo a rematch later in Italy.
I love Arguello. I don't think he was better than Olivares but I'll five him the edge based on how much I like the look of him on footage.
There's not a massive amount between them but, I'd go with Arguello. His meaningful career lasted longer, over a similar shift upwards in weight, with relatively more success. Olivares, in some respects, could be considered the light that burned twice as bright but half as long.
X2. Arguello even via defeat in Pryor 1 (and tainted it may have been!) was utterly magnificent. Amazing fighter. Alexis also beat Olivares H2H and with Olivares past his best and up in weight and Arguello prior to his best and under his best weight it has to count for a little in the overall sum of parts. Alexis has a very impressive list of victims, particularly at 130. Limon, Chacon, Boza and Navarrete all did some very good work post Arguello beatings. I definitely have Alexis.