atsch Some of the idiotic things i read from u trolls never ceases to amaze me, i gaurantee you, you are a youtube troll called larry bailey, I've seen come out with nonsense like this before La cruz is glorified joan guzman embarassing to even conjure a response to this garbage, la cruz would beat any pro, kovalev and ward in the style he uses now, he'd outbox them both very comfortably
based on what? when i signed up here, i know what's it's like, the worst judges in aiba know more about boxing than a lot of guys here
Whatever helps you sleep at night. That you need to portray every loss for your guy as a robbery while excusing away valid wins for others is a perfect indicator that you're too insecure about this whole thing. I don't know why you've got such an inferiority complex given that Cuba has numerous ATG amateurs and a phenomenal amateur program. They don't need you making excuses for them. Quit treating fans like haters just because we're not as nuts as you.
Ward of 2004 vs La Cruz of today...not sure who to pick. La Cruz would tag Kovalev left right and centre.
every loss as a robbery? really like what? valid wins? So you'll disagree with the majority of boxing fans and richie woodhall about toledo vs loma in the olympics? don't get me wrong it was a close fight but toledo won it no doubt, and loma said himself toledo was the best he fought, I'm insecure? about what? mate I've seen all the contests I can guarantee you I know alot more about this than you do, and alot more about technique aswell, you can believe what you want, but i'm telling you and breaking everything down, la cruz is better than lomachenko he's a better pure boxer has better technique footwork he's just better and i think you know it as well
I think La Cruz is a special fighter so started reading your posts with respect, but if you think Toledo beat Loma in 2012 and Selimov in the wsb... wow, you don't know what you're looking at and you don't know what effective footwork is.
so richie woodhall and ronald mcintosh don't know what they're looking at either? or the majority of fans? It was a close fight but toledo beat loma there no question, you must be very biased and yes alot of people thought selimov won in the wsb fight
When was that, Feb 2013 when Hrgovic was very young? Age 20 or 21. It means little now. And it was a split decision. Hrgovic has improved a lot since. If they re-match in 2016, Hrgovic wins 3-0 or via TKO.
I'm not the one needing to excuse away losses and wins to make the case. You're the only one I've seen making the claim that La Cruz was robbed against Falcao in the 2012 Olympics. Here's the reaction to the fight when it happened- were all the Cuban fans here blind, too? http://www.boxingforum24.com/showthread.php?t=421717&page=9 Fact is, great as he is, he got beat at the Olympics, so it's not as good as Loma's 2 gold medals under 2 different scoring systems. The next Olympic gold he wins will be his first. Still an exceptional talent and he should win the Val Barker, but let's keep it in perspective. Cheers. :hi:
OMG your a flat out troll, when did i say la cruz was robbed vs falcoa, you have a serious chip on your shoulder mate, la cruz had beaten falcoa 4 times that year alone, it was an off day clearly as falcoa has even been beaten by guys like kenny eagan, I can 100% ensure you lomachenko is not on la cruz level at all, and you would disagree with richie woodhall? lomachenko was beaten by selimov in the worlds, where as cruz has never been beat there, I can go like that aswell, you seem hell bent on discrediting la cruz to ensure your man looks better, when lomachenko was handled by a guy with 10 losses in salido lol, but he's as good as cruz? you'd never see la cruz crowded like that his footwork is better and on a different level