On reflection, how do you rate Hatton's performance v Malignaggi?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by DINAMITA, Apr 7, 2009.


  1. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    Yes, I am becoming a bit of a fan. I love the Tszyu performance, and I think Ricky was a BEAST back in the Tackie/Oliveira days. I always love a good bodypuncher, and the Hitman is that if anything. I like his attitude as a fighter too. He's growing on me. I still think (and hope) Pac beats him, but I really want him to do well in the rest of his career.
     
  2. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    Seriously, you couldn't be more wrong. Just because I am a Pacquiao fan does not mean I hate his opponents. I love Marquez, Barrera, Morales, and back in the day I was a big Oscar fan. This thread was a genuine question because I found this such a hard fight to judge. I am starting to really like Ricky Hatton as a fighter, and I have said time and again that this is a 50-50 fight and that Hatton has a good chance of victory.

    Please do not impose your own childish and irrational fanboy mentality on real boxing fans. :hi:
     
  3. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    If you haven't seen me giving Brit fighters due respect, you can't have been on the board much lately then. You've missed me going to war in defence of Hatton and Haye (Hatton especially, and very recently. Check my post history).

    You're wrong on this count chum.

    And irrespective of how good Hatton was v Paulie, he is not Roy Jones in terms of speed. He should not have been able to land straight lead hooks right off the mush so easily and/or so frequently.
     
  4. socrates

    socrates THE ORIGINAL... Full Member

    7,559
    3
    Sep 30, 2008
    lol,its hardly war is it?

    who mentioned jones?

    did i hurt your feelings?
     
  5. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    Not at all. Check my posts over the last week. I fought for about 12 pages and 5 hours in defence of Hatton's warrior mentality. When was the last time you went to bat for a British fighter so convincingly?? Your allegation is ill-informed and unfounded.

    I mentioned Jones because he had the speed to leap and single-shot to the head against anyone. Ricky shouldn't be able to do that against top class fighters because he does not possess that speed. Malignaggi's defence must be called into question.
     
  6. tolindoy

    tolindoy UBESTRIDTE MESTER Full Member

    6,396
    0
    Jan 22, 2009
    We'll see...:hey:hey:hey
     
  7. socrates

    socrates THE ORIGINAL... Full Member

    7,559
    3
    Sep 30, 2008
    call it then!

    funny that,i never saw the jones impersonation,i just saw a fighter establishing himself once again as the man to beat at 140 regardless of excuses,and im sure the a-feminate one would agree with me..

    though if you must use courtroom vernacular with me then have the decency to stand up when i address you :D

    the witness is excused.
     
  8. Guidokz

    Guidokz Classic Psycho Full Member

    2,154
    0
    Apr 6, 2009
    The nevada athletic commission should allow malignaggi to legally put foreign substance on his wraps for him to fight again..:yep

    Malignaggi pre coto would give hatton a tougher fight though..he could even outbox hatton all night imo.
     
  9. evil G

    evil G this_is_box Full Member

    1,240
    0
    Apr 8, 2009
    To the original poster...
    I firmly believe Hatton fought as hard as he had to against Malignaggi as opposed to his best. I agree that it looked better on paper and at the time than it does now.

    BTW Hatton will win come May 2nd.