One belt per division?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Simon Head, Nov 3, 2019.


  1. Simon Head

    Simon Head Member Full Member

    448
    543
    Jan 31, 2017
    I like many others I believe wish for the days were there was a single belt per division, where contenders could not use winning a belt to dodge fights the fans want to see, and the days when everyone knew with complete certainty who the real champion is.

    Right now as you all know things are getting more and more stupid with the belts.
    My question is can you see any situation were it could go back to being one belt per division?
     
    Simon Head, Nov 3, 2019
    Simon Head, Nov 3, 2019
    #1
  2. Veys9

    Veys9 Let's go Champ! Full Member

    433
    429
    Aug 30, 2018
    Not one belt maybe, but once a good boxer unifies all belts, he may be shaping an era like klitschko did, being the man to beat in a division.
     
    Veys9, Nov 3, 2019
    Veys9, Nov 3, 2019
    #2
  3. KO KIDD

    KO KIDD Loyal Member Full Member

    30,261
    5,876
    Oct 5, 2009
    I could live with 4 belts if they permanently did away with interims, regular/super, and any other weird distinctions
     
    KO KIDD, Nov 3, 2019
    KO KIDD, Nov 3, 2019
    #3
  4. OvidsExile

    OvidsExile At a minimum, a huckleberry over your persimmon. Full Member

    35,172
    37,881
    Aug 28, 2012
    There should be a lawsuit where fighters force the organizations to rank them according to their rules regardless of whether they hold a belt in another organization. That would solve everything. There are about 50 champions currently. It would just take a few to form a class action lawsuit.
     
    OvidsExile, Nov 3, 2019
    OvidsExile, Nov 3, 2019
    #4