One Boxing Governing Organisation

And how much money would that cost??

The only way for this to happen would be to set up a new independent body and all promoters join force to declare the body as the only one they will work with. The big issue is the promoters have the orgs in their pockets. WBC and haymon/golden boy, WBO and arum/warren.

I always thought it would be interesting if boxrec entered the market as an org similar to The Ring. Yes it has its flaws but it has a clear ranking system and all the promoters in the world use it. So it has some kind of foothold in the industry.

 

You are talking more about the promoter buying an organisation. A governing body wouldn’t have a status over fighter sponsorship or could they set up an outfit sponsor for every boxer worldwide.

Boxers would just tell them to go swivel.

 

Senator John McCain tried to bring it about it, but too many elements lose their advantage, thus the many belts proving the level of difficulty.

Decades ago the NBA belt /org was meant to do that. They failed.

 

I worked with John McCain on this. We are still in business but everyone is pretty much against us mainly because we tell the truth, promoters want to tell the world the opponent is as highly ranked as possible. ranked 4 by the WBO sounds much better than ranked 71 by the independent premier boxing organisation. www.premierboxingorganisation.com

 

Hey anyone remember that one belt that Cotto got when he beat Yuri Foreman?

 

We've established this; you choose which decisions to recognize based on your own personal scorecard. That too is quite obviously flawed.

 

Its you who is obviously flawed.... Dumbasss

 

That is a stupid statement. Every result which is over turned has an asterisk for clarity, there are not many and they are fights where 75% of press thought that the judges calls were wrong or the fight was won on an obvious injury.

 

...you don't see the issue here as you spam your website on the forum?

 

Something wrong with your wiring Nonito

 

You spam your website on this forum for years repeatedly claiming it the most superior rating system.

Your rating system literally picks and chooses when to recognize certain outcomes. That's all I have said. Why you would take offense, I'm not sure.

 

The rating system is the most superior and has been since 1993. It does not pick and choose when to recognize certain outcomes at all as you quoted.

 

Cool. He seemed like a mellow old dude. He tried.