One Boxing Governing Organisation

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Boon, Jun 29, 2019.


  1. ashishwarrior

    ashishwarrior I'm vital ! Full Member

    34,379
    11,867
    Apr 19, 2010
    Its what boxing needs
    A total new set up
     
  2. rhin0z>

    rhin0z> Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,405
    1,089
    Jul 13, 2014
    I prefer my curruption to have competition. A monopoly on corruption is unamerican.
     
    gmurphy and roughdiamond like this.
  3. roughdiamond

    roughdiamond Ridin' the rails... Full Member

    10,208
    19,482
    Jul 25, 2015
    It already happened.

    It was called the IBC, and it was much more corrupt than it has ever been today. It was literally run by killers and Gambino crime family, and ran 47 of 52 World title bouts at its peak. I did a report on it for a project. The only advantage was the better match ups.
     
  4. gmurphy

    gmurphy Land of the corrupt, home of the robbery! banned Full Member

    14,883
    10,943
    Oct 30, 2013
    At the same time?
    Id be saving my semen for hayeks pair
     
  5. ellerbe

    ellerbe Loyal Member Full Member

    39,159
    15,948
    Jul 25, 2014
    Chris Eubank Jr the #2 SMW? Hmm, your rankings aren't necessarily bad but I'm curious on what your criteria is.
     
  6. dangerousity

    dangerousity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,253
    2,301
    Jan 4, 2005
    Multiple belts isn’t as bad as people think, it allows to create more names/stars therefore amplifying the champ when there’s a unification.

    Joshua was a big deal cos he unified some belts, but really if they weren’t belt holders it would just be a guy beating a bunch of contenders and not champs.

    Nothing confusing about it, people can identify who the man is or debate it until unification.
     
  7. Oneirokritis

    Oneirokritis The Scourge of Stupid Idiots. Full Member

    7,334
    6,019
    Dec 18, 2015
    We all know it won't happen because of the ridiculous sanctioning fees each governing body is raking in.