Carl Froch! Can someone please tell me how losing to Kessler on a UD and then beating AA on a UD makes you a top p4p fighter? These ring ratings are an absolute joke! they mean nothing!! atsch
1 fight? guy beat Pascal, Taylor, Dirrell, Abraham, and gave Kessler hell That's 5 fights. he's not in my top10 yet but he's not far either.
The question you should be asking yourself is how can you possibly not rate Carl Froch as p4p top 10. If he was american you'd all be soiling your bedsheets on a regular basis.
if you rate Froch as p4p top10 you better have Dirrell right in there with him cause they are pretty much neck and neck.
His record speaks for iteslf. I have only just started giving he the recognition and respect he deserves since his last fight, but IMO he does deserves more redit than he is getting due to the challenges he has taken on. If he was from the U.S you would probably be more supportive. Check his record.
:verysad Crying like a ***** with a grazed knee, and faking neurological disorders is not P4P material in my book. However I appreciate P4P lists by their very nature are subjective, and those with direll in their top 10 are clearly simpletons. Easy criteria for wig's ignore list.
As PHILLA said, he has had 5 fights at the very top of boxing, and has won 4 of them. His resume is excellent, and is by far the best in the super middleweight division. If people are ranking Andre Ward top 5 P4P, never mind top 10, then what is the problem with sticking Froch in their? He's more accomplished than Ward. Chad Dawson was rated P4P number 4 by some, what had he done to achieve that? Beat Adamek and two old men? If you can rate fighters with lesser resumes than Froch in the P4P top 10, then surely you can rate Froch aswell?