one last thread about the size difference between PAC and PBF

Please stop posting your IQ is showing.

 

140, but you usually get the facts wrong Scatterbrains!!!!

 

The big advantage going for Pac against PBF is that PBF is already a shot fighter...

Y'all find it out after the fight, everybody here in ESB will tell ya :roll:

 

First, the fight will never happen. Second, Floyd would whip his ass!

:rasta

 

pretty much happens after every pac fight. :-(

 

it seems, the *** is here again. why don't you answer my question in the thread yesterday.

getting rocked? what, for saying that jmm is around 143 when some people say 140 during fight night? tell me, how is it that i am rocked? if you only had a brain. basic math comutative properties again danny. i will as you for the 5th time.

pac=jmm, no issue.
jmm<pbf, clearly since they are fighting at a catchweight.
now, your assertion.

pbf=pac, and in fact pac is bigger in some aspects than pbf. pictures dont like moron. look at the first page.

 

Void is very afraid of Pac.

 

facts. . at best, these people don't know for **** the exact weight when you climb up the ring. after the weighin, fighters will eat, pee, poop, eat, drink.

you can weigh them all you want, but the truth is, fans will never know the exact weight that fighters will be when they climb up the ring, unless your a nughugger, clinging to his balls.

for a clown. do you want me to bring up all the time you waived the white flag and i beat you senseless jeff, or do you want to go on your way village clown.

 

i don't let passion get in the way of thinking. smartypants, danny rand insisted even that height is not essential in weights, which is pretty ****ing stupid. height, weight, reach, these are all essential to fighters.

we do not see a fighter as big as valuev or lennox fighting in the pinweight division or flyweight. nor well we ever see a fighter as tall as arce or solis fighting in the heavies. i wrote quite a piece in post 22.

going up in weight, the smaller man will always be at a disadvantage. how can we forget tito and dlh who went up against bhop who in essense really is the same "size" as them.

 

Good post. Scatterfag is a little weird.

 

oh, dandy_randy, dainty little ***** is sore.

you still have to answer my question in the thread which i just bumped. if pac=jmm, and pbf=pac, why they hell is pbf fighting jmm at a catchweight?

i will show some of your dumb posts soon. make sure you don't scram. :yep:bbb

 

"Sorry clown. Weight class has nothing to do with height. You can be 7 foot tall, if you can make 130 you are a super featherweight. Floyd and PAc both weigh near the same on fight night, they both fought most of their careers below 147, they both were and are at their best at 140. So what are you worried about clown?"

yo, dainty little dandy_randy, this is your post from my thread. pac was at his best in 140? so how many fights did pac have at 140 again?

idiot.

weight class has nothing to do with height? how many 7footers have you seen, or even 6'5 fighters have you seen fight at 130?


moron.

 

hmm says... say what?

 

i got into an argument with dainty_randy yesterday. he insisted that pac is bigger that pbf is some aspects and in fact are the same size.

so i tutored him on the commutative properties of numbers. if a=b, b=c, then a=c. correct. since size/weight/height.

pac=jmm. no issue here.
jmm<pbf, considering this is a catchweight, if they were the same size, they should be fighting at 140 or 147 instead.

the quesiton is, is pac=pbf or pac<pbf. simple math equations.

 

tip... have them side by side. also floyd have look good muscle (weight lifting_