One thing is for sure.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by PugilisticPower, Nov 15, 2009.


Page 2 of 2
  1. Chris85

    Chris85 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,140
    1
    May 6, 2009
    LOL, that guy is always talking crap.

    If thats your GF/wife I feel sorry for her.
     
    Chris85, Nov 15, 2009
    Chris85, Nov 15, 2009
    #16
  2. r2d2

    r2d2 HATERS GONNA HATE! Full Member

    1,534
    0
    May 4, 2009
    correction

    It would be a VERY boring fight.
     
    r2d2, Nov 15, 2009
    r2d2, Nov 15, 2009
    #17
  3. Sting

    Sting Akagami no Shanks Full Member

    2,998
    0
    Jan 19, 2008
    In other words you were completely wrong. Please stop justifying what you just did. You "thought" this, you "thought" that. Which means you were wrong.

    Another thing. How is there no realistic way for Pac to beat Floyd? 1 or 2 punches ain't gonna dominate Pac buddy. Nor is his running. I've always said this, Floyd needs a respectable workrate against Pac in order to surely beat him. The lack of workrate greatly increases Pac's chances of beating 'Money'. Moreso than before.

    Floyd dictating the pace is not as easy as you make it out to be as well. This fight showed Pac's ability to control the pace of the fight AND adjust to his opponent. The measured offensive tempo Pac showed tonight is what's needed against a fighter like Floyd. The Pacquiao who swings at his opponent without utter regard for safety is gone. This is a thinking offensive dynamo were seeing now, he picks his spots well with timing, accuracy, speed and power.

    Floyd would have a hard time forcing his pace upon Manny. Trust me.
     
    Sting, Nov 15, 2009
    Sting, Nov 15, 2009
    #18
  4. holmes

    holmes New Member Full Member

    24
    0
    Jan 9, 2005
    I'm 50/50 on floyd vs pac.
     
    holmes, Nov 15, 2009
    holmes, Nov 15, 2009
    #19
  5. PugilisticPower

    PugilisticPower The Blonde Batman Full Member

    7,846
    35
    May 4, 2008
    I was completely wrong around the fact that I thought Cotto would hurt Pacquaio. I under-estimated Pacquaio's physical abilities and that, at the end of the day, was the reason my prediction didn't come through.

    Cotto hit Pacquaio early, he hit him to the body early and he found a home on Pacquaio's face throughout the fight with his strong left jab and also the right hand, but, Pacquaio's punch resistance was far greater than I expected.

    You don't see me saying "Cotto was ruined by Margarito, Pacquaio just beat a bum/shell" do you? I give Cotto all the credit for his performance, I feel he was as good as he was against Clottey in this fight.

    Cotto did what I expected from him, Pacquaio did the unexpected - Pacquaio wins.
     
    PugilisticPower, Nov 15, 2009
    PugilisticPower, Nov 15, 2009
    #20
  6. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,073
    35,202
    Jun 23, 2005
    If he does that he will be hit over and over all night.:deal You don't drop you hands against a accurate puncher like PBF.
     
    Pimp C, Nov 15, 2009
    Pimp C, Nov 15, 2009
    #21
  7. r2d2

    r2d2 HATERS GONNA HATE! Full Member

    1,534
    0
    May 4, 2009
    he did that tonight.....hahahhahaha....cotto was accurate right?
     
    r2d2, Nov 15, 2009
    r2d2, Nov 15, 2009
    #22
Page 2 of 2