One thing you have to admit about Haye is..

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by EL BULLY, Jun 29, 2011.


  1. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ

    94,578
    29,466
    Jan 18, 2010
    Well some can go both ways in different circumstances, so I go with best of 5 each...

    Tyson (US) of the 80's early 90's wins by 5/5 by KO, mid 90's loses by 3/5 by KO
    Bruno (UK) if they fight 5 times Bruno will probably win 3 (all by KO).
    Holyfield (US) loses 3 out of 5.
    Foreman (US) loses 4 out of 5, wins other one by KO (young foreman wins all)
    Bowe (US) wins 4 out of 5.
    Lewis (UK) wins all the way (5/5).
    Moorer (US) loses every single fight against Wlad
    Hide (UK) loses 4 out of 5 against Wlad every fight ending on early KO
    McCall (US) not sure, great chin, decent power, very irrational.
    Mercer (US) wins 3 out of 5.

    Now, Haye against the same bunch...
     
  2. EL BULLY

    EL BULLY Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,722
    0
    Aug 19, 2006
    Similar I suppose although Moorer and Hyde have more of a chance against Haye than they do against Wlad as he hasn't got that size advantage.
     
  3. dirty boy

    dirty boy Member Full Member

    211
    8
    Jun 16, 2011
    Back on track for a second lads.

    Haye has single handedly drummed up a media frenzy on this fight, drawing Wladimir in, both will get massive purses for this fight, and for Wladimir, there is no other fight out there that would get him this much attention and supply such a lucrative financial boost. (short of fighting his brother).

    For boxing fans across the world, it would be better if Haye could beat Wlad' as it would undoubtedly set up a class with Vitali, so we automatically, if it happened, get another big fight to look forward to, and it would draw more attention to the HW division, which can only be a good thing for boxing in general.

    I can't see Haye winning if i'm honest, and as a person, he's not entirely likeable (but the same was said of Ali back in the day) however, boxing is about entertaining, and who the hell would watch all the head to heads, pressers etc, if it was two gentleman saying nothing but nice things about each other? Again, remember what Ali did, people hated him at the time, now we watch him back and think how superb he was, but let's see what happens in the ring, that's what's important!
     
  4. madballster

    madballster Loyal Member Full Member

    37,210
    6,766
    Jul 21, 2009
    You're clueless. It doesn't show that the HW division is in shambles, it shows that there was a lack of contenders/champs from the US and the UK -- the two notable PPV markets.

    If Holyfield/Lewis/Haye were from Saudi Arabia you think they'd have been on US or UK PPV? :lol:

    PPV doesn't prove or disprove jack**** about the state of the global HW division. It just happens when big matches happen with US/UK participation.
     
  5. EL BULLY

    EL BULLY Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,722
    0
    Aug 19, 2006
    That is true to a certain extent but I have paid to watch several fights in the past that had no UK fighter involved. My mum doesn't know who Haye, Wlad or Vitali are but she could pick Tyson, Lewis and Bruno out of a crowd. THAT'S why the fights are not on PPV, and until this one get very little coverage in mainstream media.