ONLY a few more DAYS till KESSLER gets that ASS tapped!

The highlighted portion is why you should switch to Synchronized swimming or lawn bowling or something other than boxing.

 

**** me man your calendar must work differently to anyone else.

RJJ last fought at 168 in 1996. Calzaghe won his first title a year later.

The Johnson situation was bollocks and a lot of it Joes fault however Johnson's record at 168 was shocking and had he beaten him then you'd just consider it another win over a bum. Veit was an unbeaten mandatory, Puwill a late replacement but oddly enough is only held as a poor defense by Calzaghe but seems perfectly legitimate when he fought Ottke.

So you deny Joe became the universally recognised "Man" at 168? If you do deny this and I will add you to my ignore list forthwith that is baltant trolling.

As for Chad I think you are having trouble with you calendar again. At the time Joe chose to take huge money for a fight with RJJ Chad's best win's were a dead at the weight Amamek (who wasnt a CW champ at the time and who now fights 40lb heavier just to emphasise how much trouble he was having with weight) and going life and death with old man Johnson. He couldnt draw flies then. It simply was not a fight that could have realistically been made as neither the will nor the money was there.

And for the record Joe couldnt beat the best LHW in the world at the time as he couldnt fight himself. He had just beaten the second best LHW in the world though. A certain Mr Hopkins.

You are just showing you colours now. All you want to do is try and slag off fighters from anywhere but your home country, you zenophobic tit. Why bring up Joe and Ricky in this thread at all? Ahh thats it - you think if your boy beats kessler your hatred for Calzaghe will somehow be vindicated? You sad twat.

 

There is an extreme hatred for Kessler by Ward's fans and by Ward's judges/referee/commentators.

 

Danny is a serial twat and he cant help it. He's been proved wrong on every prediction I've seen him ever make. He knows NOTHING about boxing. But he will still be here trolling no doubt.

The other twat will just **** of and make another username and start trolling with that one come the next fight between an American and European.

 

Jumping the gun a bit Farmy...I sure hope not!

 

I have seen too many fixed fights in my lifetime. I smell a fix coming up, it's just too tempting for Ward and his judges, after the blitz about Dirrell and Haye.

This content is protected

 

Kessler is a tough guy. I like Ward, but Kessler is good. I have to go with Kessler.

 

I respectfully disagree. In 2002 while Hopkins was already quite old as fighters go he was certainly in his boxing prime. He started late and had a late and long prime. His performaces later vs guys like Joppy and ODLH show me he wasnt past prime in 2002.

 

YAwn. point remains that the fight with Jones could have been made, was there to be made, even whispers about it being made, yet it never happened. Why? Same reason the fight with Hop wasnt made. Slap was afraid to leave Wales.

If Slap had beaten johnson and johnson had gone on to do what he did, he would be vindicated for taking that fight. Instead he didnt. What is so hard to understand about this? When Mayweather fought and beat Corrales and cAstillo, there resumes werent complete, the fact they went on to have such stellar careers, adds to his legacy. Please stop using excuses because your guy didnt take on the best when he had the chance.

What was the point of fighting him twicethen clown?

God you're dumb. Can you read? YEs he became the recognized champ. But that wasnt until he defended the worst title in sports in the worst division in boxing for a decade refusing to fight in AMerica against the best opposition. HEllo mcfly! Get your brain out the gutter.

Again you're struggling with this concept. The fact that Roy Jones beat Hopkins and TOney early in their careers does not tarnish his legacy. He beat them early yes, but the fact they went on to win so many accolades, improves the roy jones mistique. Yes Adamek had not yet proven himself at crusier, that is immaterial. Slap beating Dawson would not have stopped ADamek beating Cunningham. Thus would have improved that victory. Same way that ADamek beating Cunningham, makes Dawson look better. Again this is how the sport works. Winning paper titles is not as important as who you beat. Slap hasnt beat any greats in their primes, thus his legacy is little.

Rofl. Don King had to give away tickets in the street, yet Slap couldnt have fought Dawson over Jones, of which their fight did abysmal numbers because veryone and their momma new Jones was shot? AGain your excuses are nothing but for me to laugh at.

He beat a 45 year old man, who lost basically the same fight to JErmaine Taylor, he struggles with guys who throw alot of punches, even though he is often more accurate. Congrats, Joes best win came against a faded Hopkins. What a legacy.

I could care less about Slap when it comes to KEssler. Yes like Lacy another wins of his will be exposed. But I thought Slap was an exceptional fighter who never tried to fight the best. KEssler on the other hand is a fraud who hasnt ofught anyone of significance. There is a difference.

 

Yes, knocking out a welterweight. What an achievement.:rofl

 

You need to stop feeding these critters.

This content is protected

The more you engage them in dialogue, even if you mean well and are trying to educate them, the more they will believe they are serious boxing cogniscenti.

Clearly, everything they both know combined about the sport could be written on the back of a stamp.



Let's see which rock this pair crawls under after the fight.

 

You score a fight on effective aggression. NOt aggression. Froch swinging widely and missing is not effective aggression. What Joe Frazier, Tyson and Hagler used to do is what effective aggression is. Its not impossible to beat a slick boxer. You move your head, get inside with the jab, and tear up his body. Please, learn boxing.

If Froch, Valuev or whoever cant do it, they should get out of the sport. Froch got pounded in the 10th-11th and 12th, from what I hear Valuev got hurt when Haye decided to let his hands go. If they dont want to be humiliated, learn to box better.

AS for Kessler chance of getting robbed. Maybe. Turnaround is fair play.

 

Seeeeeeee..........that's the game that is being played. It's to set up a fixed fight. Dirrell holding, running, falling down on canvas and complaining, therefore, he should have won. Haye ran without fighting, therefore he should have won, but what if Valouev had refused to throw punches and just ran around the fight without throwing punches also? How do you find a winner? It's your favorite.

How do you know for sure the fight is fixed? Who are Ward's judges and referee?

 

The only fight I got wrong this year was Paulie vs Diaz. And even though Diaz is one of my favorite fighters I was man enough to admit Paulie got jobbed.

Im pretty much perfect for the year otherwise no counting Dirrell vs Froch. I pretty much predicted how that fight would go except for the robbery.

So once again, you know nothing.:yep

 

For the first 5 rounds, Dirrell outjabbed and outboxed Froch. Around round6 Froch knew he couldnt win this way and decided to start rabbit punching, holding behind the head and at one point body slams dirrell. dirrell only fell down twice. ONce when Froch grabbed him behind the head and swung him down, and another time where it looks like Dirrell simple lost his balance throwing a punch. wHile Dirrell did fight a little negatively, some holding from 6-9. From rounds 10-12 he made up for it by standing his ground and beating Froch's head in. PErsonally I would have perferred him to have moved mroe and stuck his jab instead of descrediting his pedigree and skill sinking down to Crotches level.

AS for the Haye Valuev fght. AGain. Learn head movement, footwork and body punching. Julio Cesar Chavez had no trouble catching MAcho. STep your game up.

The fight wont be fixed. But with Dirrell getting robbed so blatantly, Im sure some revenge will be in order.