I dont see anyone from MW to LHW beating Kessler (except by lucky KO punch). Calzaghe had to keep him away with great footwork, fast hands and an excellent jab for 12 solid rounds of boxing. He also had to have the chin to take some wicked shots. Add to that his stamina, accuracy and balls. I believe it was Calzaghes superior experience and natural boxing brain that won him the fight. Now who else has the assets to beat Kessler?
Pavlik has a slight chance. Kessler may be vulnerable to a sustained body attack. But I still prefer Kessler.
it was definately his experience and brain (and speed obviously). Cause Calzaghe's initial plan was to work his way on the inside using angles to avoid the 1-2, but Kessler ended up having a pretty good arsenal of punches including a very nice right uppercut on the inside which he landed cleanly on Calzaghe a few times. Kessler is very accurate and was catching Calzaghe trying to get on the inside. In round 5 Calzaghe used his smarts and experience to change his style and saw that he could use his jab to throw off Kessler's timing and then move in and out with power shots. At this point Kessler should've adapted his strategy but tbh i think he was confused at this new Calzaghe tactic and never quite settled down until the 12th when he knew it was do or die.
How do you know this? Who exactly has he fought to make him so great? He seems to be very over hyped.
This must be a joke. Kessler looked like a grenade went off next to him after the 4th rd. No confidence, just nothing there. Sure he had a few lapses back to reality. Overall a very poor showing by the Dane. With this showing alot of fighters would've had their way with Kessler. Let's face it he left his balls in Denmark and it showed. Any top fighter in the divisions listed above could've beaten this claimed warrior. Cheers:thumbsup
Its not so much his opponents, its how he won his fights. All of them in dominant fashion. All the different styles he faced, he thrashed. And his opponents werent the tomato cans people make them out to be. Sure they werent all world beaters but he did what he was meant to do and then some. Andrade was limited but still dangerous. Good power and akward with a ****in rock chin. I bet in his whole career you will never see anyone thrash him like Kessler did. Mundine, who is one of the divisions better boxers, had arguablly his best performance to date when he lost against Kessler and Kessler was a clear winner.
You need to watch more of his fights and reaslise it wasnt his lack of skills that lost him the fight, it was Calzaghes abundance of skills. I believe there arent any other guys who are as rounded or exceptional as Calzaghe to do the job. And also I though his performance was good, just not good enough to win.
More down to Calzaghe being bloody good than any massive Kessler deficiensies. But he did worry me the way he let the fight slip away from him half way through. That will give future opponents hope to keep plugging away even if they're up against it. Hence why I mentioned Pavlik as having a slight chance despite the fact he's no Cotto!
I made a valid point yesterday, and it was - ' Most fighters against similiar opposition that Kessler has faced drop plenty more rounds than 5-6. ' And that is true, check Michael Nunn's record against similiar B level opposition, he drops rounds here and there far more frequently, has certain close events. Kessler is a special fighter.
Pavlik and Taylor are a level below. Dawson is a good pick over Kessler, but Kessler would also find home for his right hand on Chad, so Chad would have to eat a few monsterous shots like Calzaghe did in order to win. Considering Chad was dropped by a lighter Adamek right hand, I think a pin point Kessler right hand may hurt him pretty bad.
I think dawson is overrated based on his fight with Adamek... if you're gonna talk about bad performances, adameks performance the night he fought dawson would have made a lot of light heavies look good