would some fans encourange our best HW prospect to turn down a chance at the biggest prize. The heavyweight championship of the world. Plus we actively encourange good fighters not to face each other. Something is seriously wrong here for me.
In this case, yes. He's fought one decent opponent. And that opponent was domestic level and he didn't exactly have it all his own way in both fights against Sexton. People love using Mitchell vs Katsidis as an analogy these days, well the step up for Chisora is even more extreme than it was for Mitchell. He's had 14 fights, never went 12 rounds, fought one decent opponent and hasn't had a chance to fight someone of a similar style to Wlad in the past. He's going to get a serious beating - one that he may never recover from psychologically. Chisora isn't really in this for the money, and if he gets comprehensively beat at world level, then I could honestly see him retiring like Matthew Hall did. Yes, it's all very well in saying that he shouldn't turn down the chance at the biggest prize in boxing. But would you, for example, want a 100/1 shot now, or wait a couple of years, get some experience, improve as a fighter and have a 10/1 shot at it?
I don't wanna turn this thread into another Chisora Wlad thread but i agree with Kos. My take on it is this....the Klits aren't going to be around forever and i really don't feel that we have anything amazing coming through world wide on the horizon. Derek has started to gain some nice momentum and has ability to mix with European level guys right now. He has started over the last 8 months to show that he has a bit of ability but not to long ago he was struggling with guys like Paul Butlin. I understand the prestige but sometimes patience is a virtue and i think in time he could grab a shot at the title. I see both sides of coin but i don't feel he's giving himself a fair chance to win by jumping in so early. He's had no learning or bridging the gap fights, will have so many mental disadvantages such as never being 12 rounds, That's going to tell on him believe me..before and during fight he will start to ask them questions when Wlad is laying into him. Never fought anyone remotely world class etc. It's a lamb to the slaughter and sometimes fighters don't always take the positives.
Yes, I apologise for taking the thread off on a tangent :good Hmm, how about this for only in British boxing: [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-Q0KqEZ4Ro[/ame]
No probs Kos. It's a fair point from Beeston but i side with your thoughts, Ahhhhh Watched this other day...beautiful fight. The ending is truly what boxing is about and in this country especially.
Richie Woodhall admitting he'd lost to Glen Catley. I was always a fan of Richie, but that took my respect for him to another level. No pretentiousness, always honest, down to earth and no ego massaging needed. He didn't make any excuses, he could've blamed it on the Nardiello fight falling through and said he was thrown off as he was preparing to fight a southpaw but no, he took his lumps like a man. That's the type of attitude our beloved sweet science needs more of and that's the type of people we produce.
Great Shout Slip, Remember that night well, On train with my dad as a kid...we had a bet over something and i won and he said tell you what i fancy Catley to do Woodhall..what you think i said nah Woodhall will win..he said ok put your money where your mouth is. I did and for 12 rounds i sat there :-(...:fire....until the scorecards were read out and i couldn't believe it i jumped up in air and celebrated..but i knew Catley should of won and i remember that interview and as you say pure class. Someone mentioned that Richie was drinking ridiculous amounts of Pure Orange juice at the weigh in and that his weight was a real issue at that time.
I'm a third of the way through his book, and he was ****ing mental as a kid, teenager and young man. Always fighting, even in the army outside of the ring......... He said he sustained most of his scars, and damages before he even started boxing.... You should buy the Book..!!!!
What made it even better was the decision wasn't a complete robbery. It wasn't like Catley absolutely dominated, Glenn won but it wasn't the most outragious decision you'd ever seen and there was Richie being completely honest...immedietely after the fight not waiting years after to admit it, doing something he really didn't have to do. Was it weight issues or a slight injury that he had? It's funny because Richie always had issues before fights, he was unlucky in that sense. He was a really hard worker in training and might've miss-judged and over done it before that fight, he'd just moved up to 168 after the Holmes fight though so it shouldn't have been a problem. I think he had issues with Catley coming in at short notice and changing his preparations for a different style ala Lennox with Vitali.
Yeah it was a robbery, Richie looked ashamed to be holding the belt. It was weight for this one. As you say he may of over done the weight but i remember the pundit on Sky saying he was worried when Richie was drinking a lot of orange juice in weigh in. Catley wasn't the easiest late notice guy you could have, he was a very good fighter around that time.
Didn't Barkley say something beforehand to the effect of 'he ain't gonna be able to just throw big right hands at me' and that's exactly what Benn did I think if Barkley had been given the chance to continue, it would've been a 2 or 3 round war. He still couldve come back IMO, but emphatic, Warrior like stuff from Benn, very lucky not to have it stolen away from him, hitting Barkley when he was down was heat-of-the-moment but risky stuff. Benn was fierce.