Many fans & pundits claim that GGG was robbed against Canelo in the first fight (some even think the same for the rematch) and won in a landslide. However, thats not how I see things. Golovkin was tentative from the start and was getting backed up as early as the 2nd (go watch it back again if you don't believe me). He never really got his attack going & only came forward when Canelo stopped punching & back peddled. Lesser fighters like Angulo, Kirkland & Smith fought more confidently against Canelo than GGG did in the 1st fight, and GGG is far superior to any of those fighters. I felt a draw was reasonable and the right result. The only problem was Adelaide Byrd's scorecard. He fought a lot better in the 2nd fight imo (even though he was on the back-foot the whole fight), but he took a lot more risks than he did in the 1st and let his hands go more. The only problem I had was that he didn't go to the body & backed up a bit too much. This one was closer & could have gone either. No robbery here. Neither was the first.
It's two very close fights for me. The first one has as many 114-114 cards from ringside as i've ever seen. Any close card is ok by me.
I scored both fights as narrow decision wins for GGG. Close rounds to call and I don't begrudge anyone that had Canelo winning.
Both fights 8-4 to Golovkin. In the first fight Canelo boxed well off the backfoot and landed some good counters. However Golovkin outworked him, pushed him back and controlled him with the jab. In the second fight Canelo tried to do the same thing to Golovkin who took the opportunity to land some great counters himself and imho not only landed the harder shots but also had Canelo genuinely hurt at one point. Again GGG outworked ginger. I felt the second fight was the better, more action packed one. There is a lot of bias in Canelo's favour with regards to these two fights. Vegas is seen as ginger's "hometown" and the decisions he gets there are nearly always unreasonably skewed towards him. Golovkin was aware of this which is why he even offered to fight Canelo at the Azteca Stadium in Mexico because he felt he'd get a fairer shake there. Says a lot imho. For example, there was the whole "story of the fight" bull**** pushed where he was talked up by the commentary team just because he didn't run like the first fight. Basically people gave Canelo extra points just for standing his ground. In the first fight he was talked up for "ring generalship" where he walked Golovkin into counters and on occasion made him miss wildly. OK. In the second fight Golovkin returned the favour, landed some thunderous shots and made Canelo miss wildly ... and all of a sudden there's no talk of "ring generalship" and "defence" but only of how Canelo stood his ground Like, really? It's beyond obvious that the "money" fighter will win fights where he's still conscious and standing in his hometown, and that's what happened here.
The vast major of ring cards say GGG won the first fight. There are more GGG 116-112, and 115-113, then total draws and the Canelo crds are very few. GGG out landed Canelo in 10 of 12 rounds. A few sample score cards Brian Campbell (CBS sports): 116-112 Golovkin Dan Rafael (ESPN): 114-114 draw Salvador Rodríguez (ESPN Mexico): 114-114 draw Gareth A Davies (The Telegraph): 116-112 Golovkin Josh Peter (USA Today): 115-113 Golovkin Sports Illustrated: 114-114 draw Dylan Hernandez (LA Times): 115-113 Golovkin Lance Pugmire (La Times): 114-114 draw *******: 114-114 draw Chris Mannix (Yahoo! Sports): 115-113 Golovkin Kevin Iole (Yahoo! Sports): 114-114 draw The Guardian: 116-112 Golovkin Joe DePaolo (Washington Post): 115-113 Golovkin The Associated Press: 114-114 draw Bill Simmons (HBO and The Ringer): 114-114 draw Steven Muehlhausen (Sporting News): 116-112 Golovkin Michael Montero (MonteroOnBoxing): 115-113 Golovkin George Willis (New York Post): 114-114 draw Jeff Powell (Daily Mail): 116-113 Golovkin Mike Coppinger (Ring Magazine): 114-114 draw Sherdog . com: 116-112 Golovkin Jai Bednall (news . com . au): 115-113 Golovkin Brian Mazique (Forbes): 114-114 draw Adam Abramowitz (Ring Magazine and SN Boxing): 115-113 Golovkin Tom Craze (Bad Left Hook): 116-112 Golovkin Fraser Coffeen (Bloody Elbow): 115-113 Golovkin Matt Christie (Boxing News): 115-114 Golovkin Below The Belt Podcast: 115-113 Golovkin World Boxing News: 115-113 Golovkin
12 people from your list scored the fight 114-114. That's 12/29 cards. A phenomenally high number, extraordinary. It is abnormal to see so many drawn cards.
I had GGG winning the 1st fight by 2 rounds. For the 2nd fight I had Canelo winning, but around 2 rounds.
Yeah, all of them. I saw cash being handed out by the bushel. It's on the video. Only kidding about the press row, but did you think Adelaide Byrd's 118-110 card was clean of all guilt, or was she (is she) simply incompetent. I had GGG winning the first fight 7-5; the second was a draw to me but I'd have no problem with Canelo winning by a round.