Orlando Salido - Hall of Fame worthy? Yes or No

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Flo_Raiden, Dec 21, 2017.


Hall of Famer?

  1. Yes

    16 vote(s)
    41.0%
  2. No

    23 vote(s)
    59.0%
  1. pistal47

    pistal47 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,779
    4,296
    Jul 14, 2007
    Whoever sad it's flat-out about wins and losses? Isolating one factor or aspect from the whole picture and defaulting someone in on that alone is bad form. Look, if you think he deserves to get in, that's fine. I don't think he should, but neither of us are right or wrong. But make you're judgement on the whole picture.

    There aren't many fighters I've enjoyed watching in the last 20 years than Orlando Salido. I admire and respect him as a fighter immensely. Every time he entered the ring, he BROUGHT it. He ALWAYS came to fight, and he always did what he had to to be competitive, even if it meant bending or breaking the rules. To me, those are extremely admirable characteristics, and I really respect him for that. He got into a TON of wars and his fights were almost always very exciting and entertaining, but I'm sorry, those don't get you into the "truly elite" crowd in my book.
     
    OvidsExile and drenlou like this.
  2. drenlou

    drenlou VIP Member

    75,537
    40,052
    Jan 22, 2015
    This content is protected
     
    pistal47 likes this.
  3. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    245,428
    241,044
    Nov 23, 2013
    I've got a little suggestion for you Todd, if you're an adult.... talk actual boxing A LOT MORE, and TROLL A LOT LESS.


    Stop with these cringeworthy posts and cringeworthy terms like Tub Of Goo Lou, and knock if off with the repetitive pissing chimp or squirrel smiley, its played out, have at it in the Lounge, but keep that **** off the main page and quite trying to provoke these guys into flame wars. Also, I'm hereby banning the term plague rat, I find that **** offensive, especially when being used the way you're using it.
     
    Walter Sobchak and drenlou like this.
  4. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    245,428
    241,044
    Nov 23, 2013
    :shakehead: Siri is an outlaw, he's done nothing Ward, BHop and several other dirty fighters haven't done or attempted several times, he gets a pass in my book, because at least he was entertaining while bending the rules, give the man a pass.
     
    OvidsExile likes this.
  5. drenlou

    drenlou VIP Member

    75,537
    40,052
    Jan 22, 2015
    This content is protected
     
  6. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    245,428
    241,044
    Nov 23, 2013
    Another criteria should be what type of impact did you leave in the sport..... and he's left an impressive one, win or lose. He should be in.
     
    pistal47 and OvidsExile like this.
  7. OvidsExile

    OvidsExile At a minimum, a huckleberry over your persimmon. Full Member

    35,280
    38,065
    Aug 28, 2012
    Blood and guts and he ducked no man. Made a lot of the games best look like frightened children.
    This content is protected
     
    CST80 likes this.
  8. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    245,428
    241,044
    Nov 23, 2013
    OvidsExile likes this.
  9. drenlou

    drenlou VIP Member

    75,537
    40,052
    Jan 22, 2015
    OvidsExile and CST80 like this.
  10. pistal47

    pistal47 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,779
    4,296
    Jul 14, 2007
    Look, like I said, neither answer is right or wrong, and even though I don't agree with it, I CAN see the argument for him and I like and respect him enough as a fighter to roll with it either way. We aren't seeing eye to eye here because our definition of "truly elite" is so far off. What does the Hall Of Fame mean to you? What is YOUR definition of a HOF level or worthy boxer and what standard do you set for the club? Impact on the sport and official professional record are two factors that play into the whole, and they shouldn't be ignored or left out, but to me, there are far more prominent factors than those to take into consideration. Quantify and define the boxer as best you can, that's all any of us can do. What was he as a boxer? What does the eye test tell you? What skills/how skilled was he? How did he win and how did he lose, and to whom? What did he do on his biggest stages? I could be here for an hour doing this so I'm all set.

    If you think he should be in, fine. That's your definition and standard of "truly elite" though, not mine.
     
  11. The Professor

    The Professor Socialist Ring Leader Staff Member

    26,099
    18,552
    Sep 29, 2008
    Huh?? Not even CLOSE!!!!
     
  12. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    245,428
    241,044
    Nov 23, 2013
    :ohno
     
  13. J Jones

    J Jones Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,828
    1,415
    Jul 19, 2017
    Despite the excitement factor, I have to respectfully disagree. He lost decisively to all the HOFers he fought. Plus he lost TWICE to Ivan Robinson, by TKO to Angel Manfredy, and required a trilogy to get the better of Mickey Ward. Ward was an honest fighter, but let’s face it. If Mark Wahlburg grew up in Texas instead of Massachusetts, there’d be no movie (The Fighter) and a lot less people would care about a Gatti and/or award.
     
    pistal47 likes this.
  14. pistal47

    pistal47 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,779
    4,296
    Jul 14, 2007
    I gotta go to bed soon and have to be up for work at 6, so I'm pretty screwed. I'm simple as ****, and questions as obscure as the original post tax the **** out of my brain to an extent none of you smart people will ever understand.

    For me, my standard and definition of HOF boxers mostly comes down to who shined the brightest on the biggest stages against the best opposition consistently for an extended period of time, and who's boxing skill and ability truly set them apart from the rest if they could properly and consistently apply it for a long time. I LOVE Gatti and Salido as fighters, and Mickey Ward is one of my favorite fighters of all time, if not my favorite. But in my eyes, they aren't HOF boxers. FMJ, Pac, JMM, B-Hop - they are HOF to me. Even though I like Gatti, Salido, and Ward more than those guys as fighters, and even though I enjoyed watching their fights more, they aren't in that club and there is nothing wrong with that. Even though I wouldn't put them in the HOF, I'm not saying they are less of fighters than HOF'ers, just different. HOF boxers, their skills pay the bills. Guys like Gatti, Ward, and Salido - their toughness, will to win, drive, desire, and other intangibles are what payed the bills. I've boxed for many years, and have nothing but respect for anyone who boxes at the professional level, I'm not saying one group is better than the other, they're just different.

    For the record, I respect and admire the group of fighters like Gatti, Ward, and Salido more than any other group of fighters. They did more with less for longer than most.
     
    J Jones and Nonito Smoak like this.
  15. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    Salido was a dirty fighter, but he fought clean compared to SOB Ward! At least he fought hard, had some real wars, esp. with Lopez.....................but HOF? Not really.................