This fight could have very easily happened in 1989. Both men were ranked in the top 10 and both were thrown around as possible pre-title opponents for a rising Evander Holyfield. In 1989 Orlin Norris was 22-1 and the NABF heavyweight champ. Damiani was around 25-0 and the WBO champ. Both were boxer but Francesco was bigger and had a decent punch while Norris was fast and awkward. Consequently Norris lost a decision at the end of the year to Tony Tubbs which was later changed to a no contest. A few months later he was beaten by Bert Cooper. He managed to put together a decent win steak after that but never really did anything of note again at heavyweight.. Damiani sat low in the weeds until Ray Mercer fought and beat him in 1991..
I think it would be an interesting test for Francesco. Norris was short, awkward, quick and tricky to fight. not really anything like the sort of opponents that Damiani generally faced.
I have watched quite a bit of Damiani, and he's a fighter that grows on you. He looks like a big potato in the ring, and you sort of wonder what he's doing there against these ripped heavyweights. Then it turns out that he's actually got quite a nasty jab. And that he hits with authority with either hand. And that he strings together some sweet combinations. And he can infight. And his chin's pretty good. He did everything "pretty good" and the cumulative effect was a well above-average heavyweight. Suddenly the big potato is wearing down and outboxing useful heavyweights like Biggs, Mercer and Page, not to mention knocking out fringe contender Du Plooy. It's a shame that he never faced some bigger names, I think he could surprise some people. Certainly he surprised Mercer, until Ray managed to just about detach Francesco's nose with a hail mary punch. I wonder if Damiani wouldn't have been a bit too big for Norris?
I'd probably edge Francesco as well. He was a decent 6'3 and from the looks of him had a good wingspan to go along with sound boxing ability and power. That's a bad combination for Norris who in 1989 was outboxed to a clear defeat by and aging Tony Tubbs. I think Orlin's speed and awkwardness would make it an interesting fight however and Damiani would have to work for that win. It is a shame that Damiani wasn't given bigger fights earlier. By 1991 he was already 33 years old and hadn't done a great deal in some time. He still looked sharp in those first 7 or 8 rounds against Mercer though. Incidentally I think a prime Damiani outboxes McCall.
You nailed it. Damiani was offered a title shot vs Holyfield and he declined. Apparently he was fearful of needles, and needed some type of shot for an injury.
I agree. Damiani was probably a better pure boxer than Norris and has reach and height on him. Hard to see how Norris wins this. I think it will be a cagey affair with little real drama.
Damiani by decision He uses his size and moderate boxing ability to stink out the joint and win a close decision. He would tie up Norris on the inside.