A. I thought the draw was fine in Ortiz-Peterson, close fight, perhaps I shouldn't have said he was "fortunate." B. Bradley looked good in his one fight at 147, albeit against a much much worse opponent than Ortiz' fight. That being said, I don't think Ortiz was a bad opponent, I thought it was the right fight for Floyd to take. I thought he was great. I also thought Floyd didn't get enough credit for his wins against Mosley and Marquez. Though older they are GREAT fighters. Ortiz is the type of guy that will defend a belt once or twice and lose, but never beat a great fighter, there were no better options for Floyd at 147, considering his restrictions, and I thought it was a better fight for him to take than Bradley, for instance, given that he had the belt and was coming off the better win. Still, saying that, I think Bradley is clearly the better fighter. I don't see how that's hypocritical. Floyd is so great he could beat guys like Ortiz and Bradley weekly.