oscar bonavena vs ken norton prime vs prime

ey interesing fight, i never did think about this one. i think that it is a pretty fair match, prime vs prime, bonavena was the stronger man for sure(i don´t care about the beautiful body of norton), bonavena was more robust and he had more functional physical strength, norton was more skilled,taller and 9 pound sheavier prime vs prime . bonavena had clearly a better chin he took shots from ron lyle, frazier and chuvalo, norton had maybe a little more of stamina, hitting power is pretty even but i go with bonavena, norton had a much better jab, but his style was great against boxers type ali or holmes, i don´t know how he would fare against a tough , strong like a bull, short and rhythm breaker like bonavena.
:smoke

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

vs

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

 

BONAVENA WAS A HARD PUNCHER FOR SURE, THE PROBLEM IS THAT HE DID NOT HAVE GREAT ACCURACY OR SKILL TO HIT IN THE CORRECT MOMENT AND CORRECT PLACE , THE SAME THING WITH CHUVALO, BUT WHEN THEY DID CONNECT A GOOD HAND THEIR KOS WERE VERY HARD. Norton would be in danger because bonavena dropped frazier twice and frazier had a better chin than norton.

 

yes, and ali called oscar the beast

 

goldman said also that he did hit harder than marciano....

 

Bonavena. Hes sturdier. Norton gets overrated based on his fights with Ali.

 

i agree