Oscar De La Hoya and Tito vs GGG at 160

Meaning, you think I would have to be simply delusional, and out of touch with reality to even suggest that Oscar can beat Golovkin. I don't think it's out of the question honestly, given GGG'S current resume. It's quite possible.

 

Why did you write that I believe that GGG beats any fighter from any era?

 

How old are you? At your age and with your online experience, you can't tell when you see a typo? Who am I dealing with? atsch
Eubanks is calling him out
Lara is aclling him out
Trout has called him out
Canelo told him where to find him
Ward sent an offer and got rejected by GGG

More than enough fighters want to fight him

 

Considering Oscars resume at 160, no it's not.

 

If Oscar liked Hopkins' body shots, just wait until he gets a taste of GGG's.

 

Sure it is.. Anything is possible:deal

 

Oscar and Tito were some bad mofos at 147 and 154 especially, but 160, Oscar didn't carry his speed or power and Tito lost a step or 2, but he could still crack at 160. Ggg is a natural 160lber, silver medalist who got robbed and really shoulda been a gold medalist, is a giant killer and used to fighting and beating fighters taller and bigger than him, iron chinned, and a pressure fighter with a high ring IQ, which you'd expect from a slick or technical boxer. Oscar and Tito would be competitive at best, but Ggg destroys them worse than Hopkins did.

 

Im sure its because your arguments are along the lines as most GGGstans who actually make those types of claims.

 

I don't know..mistaken identity I guess. Apologies.

 

Canelo. Are you ****ing serious? How old are you? **** Ward. He's inactive and full of it. You have proof of all of Golovkins ducking these people? Source?

 

:yep

 

http://www.boxingforum24.com/showthread.php?t=567124

There are 5 links you can read in the thread above

:deal

 

I claimed GGG beats Oscar due to Oscar getting a gift against Sturm, a nothing special middleweight. Is that an untrue statement. Did Oscar outright beat a decent at best belt holder in Sturm? Was Oscar the better middleweight? I wrote GGG beats Tito because Tito was chinny at 147. How many times was Tito knocked down at 147? How am I wrong about either point? Please elaborate.

 

Youre not wrong but neither is anybody else. These are hypothetical matchups, every opinion is valid.

 

:deal Very reasonable