Oscar De La Hoya: best 1st 5 years of any career ever??

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by DINAMITA, Aug 4, 2008.


  1. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    Was Chavez really shot though? I'm lifting this from a thread on that very subject from yesterday:

    - Chavez's record was 96-1-1

    - The fight was at light-welterweight- where Chavez had been fighting regularly since 1989

    - He was 34 years old

    - Since suffering his first career loss to Frankie Randall in 1994, Chavez had won 7 out of 7 (5 inside the distance) leading up to the 1st DLH fight, including a points win over Giovanni Parisi, and stoppages of Meldrick Taylor, Tony Lopez, and Randall in a rematch

    - In his last fight before DLH, Chavez stopped Scott Walker (21-3-1) in the 2nd round

    - In his 3 fights following the DLH fight, he stopped Joey Gamache (45-2) in the 8th, and also beat Tony Martin and Larry LaCoursiere


    Like Whitaker, he was past-prime but not exactly "shot" (like for example RJJ is now).

    As I said, if names on the resume mean more than achievement, Leonard's is better. It's a tough call. I rule out Tyson for the Douglas KO loss. He's 3rd for me.
     
  2. Mantequilla

    Mantequilla Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,964
    78
    Aug 26, 2004
    Exactly sweetpea.His P4P rating was highly contentious nonsense, i suspect mainly designed to spite Jones because he was getting lazy with his matchmaking.

    and i'm just not impressed with flatly using numbers of world titles to boost arguments when those titles are splinter belts and WBO crap.Should we put Grigorian on the same level as Benny Leonard because he defended a lightweight world title belt so many times?.

    Sticking to ability shown and opinions on fighters defeated should be the most important thing.If anyone thinks Oscar rates extremely highly in those respects for his first five years that's fair enough.
     
  3. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    Genaro Hernandez - Genaro probably outweighed by 15lbs coming up in weight, good win but Genaro wasnt really a great

    Ruelas - top win, not against a P4P fighter

    Chavez - Chavez was not longer P4P and was ranked below Randal and Tyszu at 140

    Whitaker - Whitaker was fortunate to get the win in his previous fight against Hurtado and would have lost if it wasnt for a stoppage. Whitaker won on 50% of fans cards and Delahoya ducks the rematch

    Now compare that to wins over:

    Toney: P4P no1 for many, undefeated, completely shut out

    Hopkins - Middleweight champ for next 11 years and 1 of the best ever at that weight

    Mallinger - beat Nigel Benn once and robbed against him another time, dispatched in a 1 sided mid rounds stoppage
     
  4. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    88
    Nov 8, 2004
    Oscar became no. 1 p4p in the Ring rankings during the period where Jones got DQ'ed for hitting Griffin when he was down. This was also the time when DLH beat Whitaker.

    They put DLH no.1 despite the writer for Ring who covered the DLH-Whitaker fight (Steve Farhood) thinking Whitaker had done enough to beat DLH.

    In truth, DLH was never better than Roy Jones.
     
  5. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    A sure sign he'd been in the game for a LONG time.

    That's all good, but it doesn't give any credence to him not being shot.

    That's pretty old for a fighter of Chavez's style.

    The stoppage in the Randall rematch is one of the most bogus in the history of the sport. He was cut and didn't want to fight anymore so they awarded him the victory. Complete BS. Taylor was shot by that point as well.

    None of these guys are top class operators at the time though.


    He was passing his prime against Whitaker, and that fight put him on the downward spiral methinks. He was just a shell by the time Oscar took him out.

    If you count the Douglas loss than maybe. Names on a resume(as long as they're taken into context) mean A LOT more than paper accomplishments to me. Saying Oscar being Chavez twice sounds great at first unless taken into context.
     
  6. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    Toney wasn't in the 1st 5 years though. Jones Jr's 1st 5 ended in May 94, the Toney fight was in November. The whole point of the thread is who had the best 1st 5 years.
     
  7. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    No-one would ever suggest he was, but the fact on paper is that he was pound-for-pound number 1 after 5 years.
     
  8. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,217
    170
    Jul 23, 2004
    I'm pretty sure Jones was still #1 after De La Hoya beat Whitaker. That changed after Jones was DQ'd against Griffin 4 months later then De La Hoya took the top spot. I'm pretty sure De La Hoya stayed there until he was beaten by Trinidad. I'm not 100% on all that. I could check with the Rings from around that time which are in neat piles at the top of my cupboard. It means lifting a few off as they are at the bottom of the pile.
     
  9. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    The Douglas loss has to be counted- it was within the 1st 5 years. Is Tyson's 1st 5 year resume really clearly better than De La Hoya's? I'm not sure it is. Larry Holmes was more shot than Chavez or Whitaker, and the rest (Thomas, Tubbs, Tucker etc) were not any better p4p IMO than guys like Genaro Hernandez and Rafael Ruelas. DLH only beat Chavez once in his 1st 5 years. I think it's definitely between him and Leonard.
     
  10. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    Don't disturb them- you're quite correct
     
  11. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    88
    Nov 8, 2004
    At the end of 1996 Jones was p4p no.1 and Oscar was the no.2 p4p. Jones got DQ'ed about 3 weeks before Whitaker-DLH took place (Jones got DQ'ed in March 1997, the DLH-Whitaker fight happened in April 1997). I'm pretty sure DLH became no.1 exactly when he beat Whitaker and by the the time of the DLH-Quartey fight Jones reclaimed the top spot from DLH.

    I'm not sure of this, but if you have the mags from around the time, it would well be worth bringing them out.
     
  12. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,217
    170
    Jul 23, 2004
    Apoligies. I'm getting mixed up with the Jones-Griffin rematch which was in August 97, four months after De La Hoya-Whitaker. I have a feeling that Whitaker was #2 behind Jones at the end of 96. Only one way to check. Back soon.
     
  13. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,217
    170
    Jul 23, 2004
    The Ring, December 95.

    1. Pernell Whitaker
    2. Roy Jones
    3. Ricardo Lopez

    The Ring, September 97 (Jones, Whitaker, De La Hoya all on cover) This issue was after De La Hoya-Whitaker and Jones-Griffin I)

    1. Oscar De La Hoya
    2. Roy Jones
    3. Pernell Whitaker

    The Ring, December 98.

    1. Oscar De La Hoya
    2. Roy Jones
    3. Evander Holyfield

    Don't have any Rings from late 96.
     
  14. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    88
    Nov 8, 2004
    I'm surprised Ring kept DLH at the no.1 spot for so long. Not only did their chief writer think DLH lost to Pea, but DLH then went on a bum beating bonanza taking on the likes of Kamau, Rivera, Carpentier, Camacho and Chavez. Those were the fights the no.1 fighter in the world was taking?

    Mind you, by the time Roy Jones reclaimed the p4p mantle, he wasn't fighting anything much better.
     
  15. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,217
    170
    Jul 23, 2004
    And I'm sure he was there until the Trinidad fight. 100% sure actually.