Oscar De La Hoya: Pro or Con?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by salsanchezfan, Jan 19, 2014.


  1. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,796
    11,413
    Aug 22, 2004
    What is your opinion of DLH? Great fighter, "merely" very good? Worthy of all the praise or hopelessly overrated?

    Personally, I think he was great for boxing. I know he had his detractors who will always hate the eloquent, good-looking kid coming up. They figure he should look and act like some killer cyborg or he isn't the real article, but Oscar was for real. I especially love the fact that he never ducked anybody. He fought absolutely everyone there was to go after that critics swore he would avoid: Chavez first, then Whitaker, then Quartey, Tito, Mosley.......what an era of welterweights, and he went after each and every one of them. Would be nice if a certain cherry-picker today had the same mindset. Can't have everything, I guess.

    He didn't always win the big fights, but when you TRULY challenge yourself, you will eventually get the measure taken of you. It's called being human, so I cannot and will not fault him for losing the odd fight. At least he had the balls to step up. I'd rather root for the guy that tries all the hard fights and comes up short occasionally than the "wise businessman" who will risk nothing and still point to the big, shiny, meaningless zero in his loss column.
     
  2. jc

    jc Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,971
    14
    Sep 9, 2004
    Great fighter with a great record. Also seems like a classy guy.
     
  3. lora

    lora Fighting Zapata Full Member

    10,305
    544
    Feb 17, 2010
    I don't think he was a "true great" or all-timer...blah blah whatever you want to label that real top tier of fighters that will regularly crop up as being the best 10-20 in a traditional weight or two.

    He was an excellent\ borderline great sort for me from about 95-2000 from his late lightweight days into his Welter run.After that he was mostly just good and often overestimated imo, with his couple of fights a year "superfights" milking the status he earned in the 90s for all it was worth.

    Certainly nothing notable at 154 and after the dubious loss to Mosley(where both looked rather ordinary and undersized) he did little of real merit.The bout against Mayweather was decent late career effort i guess, but far from looking any better than he had at the weight 5 years previously and Mayweather didn't look that good either.At that weight, two highly overrated fighters.Something that would have been an undercard curiosity pre-ray leonard "every fight an established top fighter has regardless of when or who against is a superfight" days.
     
  4. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,972
    48,032
    Mar 21, 2007
    Yeah, I think he's great, I think he did enough, but it's an arbitrary denomination really, isn't it?
     
  5. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,297
    7,047
    Oct 25, 2006
    I suppose if there is a little reluctance to give Oscar his due, it stems from the fact that he didn't seem like the traditional hard luck story really. Us fans love the rags to riches, school of hard knocks kinds of guys, and Oscar never really came from that sort of backround, despite him losing him mom.

    I first saw him winning the gold at the '92 Olympics in Barcelona and followed his early pro career, but he never really gelled with me personally as a fighter. I can't explain why really, but he just never appealed to me.

    That said, his record is stacked with quality names, and as said he never passed up a challenge. I'm not sure if he's a legitimate great. He lost both fights to Mosley at his peak (at least the first fight was at his peak) and I don't think Shane is really a great either.
    He got a bit unlucky against Trinidad in my opinion, but in a way he has himself to blame for that. He was pretty fortunate against Sturm I thought.

    So for me, as it stands for now, a very, very good fighter. Not really great.
     
  6. Goyourownway

    Goyourownway Insanity enthusiast Full Member

    2,667
    21
    Feb 13, 2011
    People thought he'd avoid Chavez? Did they see the Kamau fight?
     
  7. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    332
    Jan 29, 2005
    Oscar-great handpseed and damaging power, like Norris

    lost effectiveness as he moved up

    made Chavez quit with his fists, instead of clowning antics

    atg status-top 40
     
  8. dpw417

    dpw417 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,461
    348
    Jul 13, 2007
    Borderline great...definitely deserves more credit than he is given...Would Floyd even consider fighting a Hopkins?...Even for two seconds? Hell no... Oscar was great for boxing!
     
  9. ETM

    ETM I thought I did enough to win. Full Member

    13,316
    11,705
    Mar 19, 2012
    Very good fighter. Great Star.
     
  10. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009
    Great fighter, mixed it up with the absolute P4P elite of the 90s and early 00s, may not have always won but outside of his swan song against Pac and getting KOed by a MW he always kept it close.

    Chavez, Sweat Pea, Quartey, Trinidad, Mosley, Vargas, Hopkins, and Mayweather. That is quite a run.
     
  11. greynotsoold

    greynotsoold Boxing Addict

    5,496
    7,015
    Aug 17, 2011
    When he was trained by Jesus Rivero, he was on his way to becoming something very special. That man understood Oscar and his strengths, and he knew how to maximize them; a great trainer. When he left Rivero, he regressed dramatically and never became what he could have been. He was just a bit more than mediocre, honestly, for most of the rest of his career. Other 'great' trainers, like Clancy and Stewart, made a mess of Rivero's work.
     
  12. lora

    lora Fighting Zapata Full Member

    10,305
    544
    Feb 17, 2010
    It's worth mentioning that although we can reasonably say Oscar took on all-comers, he did often do it from a shrewd opportunistic perspective enabled by that strong management and early amatuer reputation.

    Chavez picked when he was old and ripe, Whitaker after he had looked like **** for a couple of years and ready to be taken....quartey after a looong layoff.

    No complaints about the timing of his other big fights, but he definitely didn't just wade in with no concern in getting the high ground beforehand, for most of the 90s we are talking about a very carefully managed career..Not that many modern post Ray Leonard fighters with a lot of pull ever do just wade in, mind you.
     
  13. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,796
    11,413
    Aug 22, 2004
    Good thoughts, but I chalk up the Chavez and Whitaker fights to those guys simply being where they were in their careers when Oscar entered those weight classes. Neither was prime by the time he got them, but that's just where their respective career trajectories led them to him. With Whitaker especially, it seemed a bit of a Catch-22.......if he fights him then, then Whitaker was old and out of it. If he doesn't fight him, then he is a ducker.
     
  14. Ted Spoon

    Ted Spoon Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,280
    1,082
    Sep 10, 2005
    In sixteen months he fought Ike Quartey, Felix Trinidad and Shane Mosley - all undefeated at the time. That's what you call willing to face your most deserving rivals.

    De La Hoya was great for boxing on many levels.
     
  15. TheSouthpaw

    TheSouthpaw Champion Full Member

    7,942
    61
    Jul 21, 2012
    Oscar was a great champion and great for boxing. Although he did lose most of his biggest fights he dodged nobody! Theres a certain champion of today that cant say that. I remember how exciting it was to wake up on a day there was a DLH fight...miss those days