Oscar De La Hoya's grasp of basic math

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Leoh, Mar 28, 2019.


  1. TheRevAshton

    TheRevAshton Member Full Member

    381
    528
    Dec 12, 2018
    Haha, brilliant!

    But what about a video titled 'Oscar De La Hoya's Wardrobe'...

    This content is protected
     
    Holler likes this.
  2. Ted Stickles

    Ted Stickles Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,244
    2,185
    Jun 24, 2007
    The only time Oscars math works is when he goes to the 2 for 1 sale on fishnets at Victoria Secret
     
    C.J. likes this.
  3. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,553
    18,238
    Oct 7, 2006
    I've seen more boxing worthy threads sent to the lounge.
     
    Badbot and aaalbert like this.
  4. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,640
    18,438
    Jun 25, 2014
    Oh man. The cost of the goods (including the profit the store would've made) is the $70 the guy spent with the money he stole. The answer is $200. (LOL)
     
  5. 3rdegree

    3rdegree Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    7,276
    9,450
    Aug 23, 2014
    Another way of looking at this problem is how much did the thief benefit?
     
  6. Holler

    Holler Doesn't appear to be a paid matchroom PR shill Full Member

    13,198
    25,190
    Mar 12, 2018
    Why, what does it benefit a man to gain $30 cash and $70 worth of unspecified but illegally obtained goods if it's only to provide Oscar De La Hoya with a moments distraction before he returns to trying to recover that uncomfortably misplaced egg whisk?
     
  7. RealDeal

    RealDeal Pugilist Specialist Full Member

    1,689
    1,829
    May 2, 2009
    The answer is $100. In the end, the store lost $70 worth of merchandise and $30 worth of cash. The cost of goods sold, and therefore the margins / profit, from the sale don’t come into play here. Instead, you need to look at the opportunity cost. In other words, if the products had not been purchased by the thief using the store’s own money, they would have been purchased by someone else for $70. Therefore, the store lost out on that opportunity to sell those products for $70. Then you add in the $30 in cash that the thief received back to get the $100 total.
     
    Oneirokritis and mirkofilipovic like this.
  8. Serge

    Serge Ginger Dracula Staff Member

    80,194
    131,375
    Jul 21, 2009
    If a fighter inserts 95% of a 12'' rolling pin up their backdoor, then how many inches of said of rolling pin are left protruding out of the fighter's backdoor?
     
  9. mirkofilipovic

    mirkofilipovic ESB Management Full Member

    28,390
    39,782
    Jan 7, 2014
    The store lost 100 dollars, the thief paid 70 dollars and kept the 30. So technically the store only lost 30 bucks.

    Sources: 3.9 GPA from University
     
    Dirsspaardis and Pimp C like this.
  10. 3rdegree

    3rdegree Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    7,276
    9,450
    Aug 23, 2014
    It just simplifies the math
     
  11. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,640
    18,438
    Jun 25, 2014
    Technically, no. You aren't taking into account what the store sold to get the initial $100.

    Let's say you had two phones. You wanted to sell one for $100. You sell the phone and now you have $100 bill in your pocket and one phone. Then someone steals your $100 bill. Now you're left with one phone, no second phone and no $100.

    Technically, you're only out $100. But you can't use the phone and you can't spend the money. You lost both.

    So you'll tell your friends you're out one phone and $100. ($200 LOL)

    But your accountant will say you lost $100.

    The other transaction is just a wash. The person paid you $70 for something you were selling for $70. It doesn't matter if they stole the money, or their mom gave it to them, or if they worked for it.
     
    Last edited: Mar 29, 2019
  12. Sugar 88

    Sugar 88 Woke Moralist-In-Chief

    27,259
    18,341
    Feb 4, 2012
    He's just an average guy who puts his fishnets on one leg at a time like everybody else.
     
    Ted Stickles, Holler and Dubblechin like this.
  13. lobk

    lobk Original ESB Member Full Member

    29,200
    18,614
    Jul 19, 2004
    Sorry , you are wrong Answer is $100.

    The thief stole $100. Now thief makes a purchase, this purchase is no different than anyone else making a purchase. You aren't losing anything at this point because it is a purchase. Only thing store lost was the $100.
     
  14. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,640
    18,438
    Jun 25, 2014
    I know the answer is $100. That's why I put LOL after $200.
     
    Oneirokritis likes this.
  15. lobk

    lobk Original ESB Member Full Member

    29,200
    18,614
    Jul 19, 2004

    Doh!!! Sorry man!