Oscar is Arum in training, Dawson gets cheated out of rematch

Not sure if I agree with everything you said, but I do think Dawson should have gotten the rematch first.

Not to mention I also believe BHop is not really looking to fight Dawson.

 

If we take the age and performance into consideration b-hop deserves to fight him first.
Dawson is a young man, he can have a tune up with steward and have dibs on the winner. thats fair to me.

 

This content is protected

Bernard Hopkins still a G

 

De La Hoya is far worse than Arum and Don King. Both came from a non-boxing background and obviously came into the sport solely to make money.

DLH should know better.

He's been a fighter, experienced and often complained about the mirky side of boxing promotions and boxing politics.

DLH is a complete sellout.

He loves to say he is the fighters' promoter and loves the sport, that's complete BS.

The dollar has always been his driving force. He'll say anything, lie, make up **** to further his ends.

Some of the things he says before and after fights is just complete garbage and cringeworthy at times. He's a ****ing lame ass and it's not hard to see through his insincerity.

 

boxings definition of a g in my mind,I have a great of ammount respect for hopkins. I think in a 20 years people will look at him as a fantastic fighter.

 

He will be the most talked about in my opinion. Fighting until he's a grandpa.:thumbsup

 

Hopkins deserves the rematch first. **** DAWSON. he is boring, and fought an unpassionate and mentally weak fight. Dawson has time to improve and change his mental make up under steward. Hopkins should fight pascal, beat him, then fight dawson, beat him. Then Bute should beat Hopkins ass and then WARD VS BUTE in a super fight, after ward disposes of CROCH.

 

So he waits.
Got his ass handed to him the 1st time.
He will get the same again against either Pascal or Hopkins.

 

Spot on.

 

he said he did after the roy jones fight

 

What the heck is a diamond belt? Would that make b-hop a proper champ if he won?

 

Pascal was the defending champion against Dawson who was the challenger

 

I agree. Love to see Dawson against the winner.

 

I dont understand this, Chad Dawson won the WBC belt against Adamek and didnt lose till his fight with Pascal. Yet somehow Pascal was WBC champ going into the fight after beating Diaconu. When did Chad lose his championship in the first place? Was he stripped for no reason?



How bout Pascal-Hopkins ME and Dawson-Cloud undercard with the winners taking each other on in the very next fight or immediately giving up their title and declaring themselves the Worlds Pussiest ***** Ass Ducker just so Hopkins cant run off into the sunset ducking Dawson.