Oscar (of the whitaker fight) vs. Prime PBF (at welter)

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by KuRuPT, Oct 31, 2012.


  1. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    Mayweather 8-4 or 9-3 decision again. This version of DLH maybe quicker and fitter but defensively probably more susceptible and he never seemed capable of fighting 3mins a round and not a ring general at all. Let's not forget the fight at 154 with a small ring really suited DLH
     
  2. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    26,638
    17,706
    Apr 3, 2012
    Floyd still wins. He might have to dig deep, but he'd still win. De La Hoya struggled enough with that version of Whitaker, who is not as good as prime Floyd.
     
  3. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    26,638
    17,706
    Apr 3, 2012
    Do yourself a favor and don't place bets.
     
  4. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,462
    2,814
    Aug 26, 2011
    That version of Whitaker still beats Floyd imo.
     
  5. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    82
    Sep 3, 2007
    No chance floyd dominates a prime Oscar, that`s a very close fight regardless of the winner, in fact I`d lean slightly towards DLH actually.
     
  6. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    82
    Sep 3, 2007
    Mmmmm... I`m not sure about that, any version of Whitaker up until the 2nd McGirt in 1994 fight beats any version of floyd but he was past it in the DLH fight in 1997, still a very good fighter but his activity had dropped considerably & that suits floyd perfectly.
     
  7. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,467
    Sep 7, 2008
    Still a damn consistent jabber though.
     
  8. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    I didn't say DLH would be dominated but he'd struggle to land clean and wouldn't win many rounds, no doubt about it
     
  9. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    88
    Nov 8, 2004
    Do me a favour and CONSTANTLY place bets :good
     
  10. dpw417

    dpw417 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,461
    348
    Jul 13, 2007
    I can definitely see the logic in picking Oscar to do better...when he fought Trinidad, the guy was a talent. I think the fight would unfold much the same way their actual fight did except Oscar's flurries would have more speed and carry more pop at the weight...and with that said, DLH may carry this to a decision.
    But also the one thing to consider is that Oscar never did make a tactical change in that fight that worked... It was said he stopped using the jab...really? If something is working in a fight...do you stop if you're having success? I don't think so. According to Freddie Roach, Mayweather took away the jab, because Oscar lost focus and started following Floyd instead of cutting him off or stepping with him...in essense, Oscar was taking himself out of position to throw his main weapon. I don't think Oscar would have fought any smarter when he was younger than when he was more experienced in that regard tactically...and also Floyd would have matched him better in physical strength at the weight...Mayweather is not being muscled around by anyone including Mosely at the weight. And with that also said, Mayweather's body work would have a better effect if Oscar was smaller.
    Floyd decision for me.
     
  11. Bogotazo

    Bogotazo Amateur Full Member

    31,381
    1,133
    Oct 17, 2009
    I agree with the several who say a competitive decision win for Oscar.
     
  12. anj

    anj Guest

    I have De La Hoya winning on points 116-112, but the compubox punch stats would show that Mayweather would by no means be the loser. You wouldn't be able to say 'Mayweather lost the fight'.

    ..Nevertheless I DEFINITELY have ODLH winning.