Oscar says GGG needs to get a belt and fight a REAL FIGHTER before he gets the 3rd Canelo fight...

GTFO!! lol

You are SOOOO reaching there. Everyone knows there are more than four champions in most divisions.

So you also agree that GGG didn't even come remotely close to tying Hopkins' MW record? LOL

Like I keep saying, you ******s can't have it both way. Now go cry to mommy.

Total fail on your part.

Spence, Crawford
Wilder, Ruiz
Canelo, Andrade
Smith, Benavidez

 

It’s not arguably at all Pacquaio’s is light years ahead.

What has Canelo conceded to lure these top fighters?

 

everyone?!?! I guess everyone who thinks like you believes that... what a f*ckin dumbass you are... You are the boxing world's best fan... gullible as hell!!

 

Well if that’s the case Hopkins only defended all 4 belts once iirc against the real tough, legendary Morrade Hakker.

 

Pac's record is smoke and mirrors. His best win is Marco Antonio Barrera, and that was Barrera after imo had lost to Morales twice and had lost to Junior Jones twice, one by KO, and was at th tail end of his career, including prime.

His win over Morales was over blown. Morales had just lost to an old Barrera and had got taken to school in his previous fight by a journey man in Zahir Raheem, AND Pac drained him to SFW when he beat him.

His title at LW was legitimate as Canelo's at SMW. It was against Journeyman David Diaz who fought a shot Morales for the vacant title and STILL needed a gift to get the decision. Pac totally avoided the much better Juan Diaz, and Joel Casamyor.

His fight against Hatton was what it was. Hatton was damaged goods after Mayweather.

Cotto was drained down to 145.
DLH was drained down to 147.

The Jr MW title was the biggest farce. It was against Margarito at 150!! lol

 

Who is the WW champion? Crawford, Spence or Pacquiao?

I rest my case dummy.

 

It's currently Pac, after beating Thurman. That's the current lineage for the WW title

 

A bit different than Fielding being lumped next to a guy who already wiped him out in a round don’t you think?

 

What???!

I think you're confused.

 

Not sure about that?I think Canelo knows that fighting at catch weights and using clauses was starting to look bad and to his credit he’s amended that but there’s no way you could say Golovkin would get any credit for fighting Cotto at 155 or Khan or Chavez at 164?Theres no right or wrong here re someone who dominates his division or one that has the ability to be able to fight in between four divisions.
Canelo is the meal ticket everyone wants but for the sake of the argument Canelo has a better resume even discounting those three above.

 

Sure, Smith > Fielding... Who is arguing otherwise?

Fielding held the same version title YOU GGGoons give credit to Golovkin for defending 10 times. That's the point that I made.

 

No it’s not at all, you are trying to claim Fielding as a legit top 10/champion level type fighter, in which he’s not or shouldn’t be in a decent division.

Fielding was a title holder never the champion in the division.

 

Cotto and Khan demanded 155, Canelo conceded.

Chvez Jr was not a championshio fight.

Do you know that Golovkin has fought above the MW limit three times himself?

 

why would GGG not get credit for fighting Cotto at 155? Cotto isn't a MW GGG said he can get down to 154 them fighting in the middle for the titles why wouldn't he get credit to this day Cotto would still be his best win. Cotto out his own mouth said if GGG was willing to do a catchweight he'd fight him so he was willing. certainly it would be more credit than the monres and Lemiuex of the world

 

No I'm not making that claim, it is a undisputable FACT that Fielding was a top 10 SMW, I am not trying to convince you that he was a top 10 SMW because he actually was.

What I can argue is that Fielding is a much bigger challenge than Vanes and Roles.