Oscar who fought Tito vs. PBF at 147 lbs

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by joito3, Jan 25, 2008.


  1. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    42,076
    3,667
    Jun 30, 2005
    :nut :lol:

    quartey outjabbed de la fishnet.

    quartey's jab was amazing, and better than the jab of goldie.

    oscar fanboys are a humorous bunch.
     
  2. joito3

    joito3 Active Member Full Member

    1,497
    1
    Mar 5, 2006
    PBF wouldn't go toe to toe with a prime ODLH he'd get ko'd easy
     
  3. michael 901

    michael 901 His ass is tired Full Member

    657
    0
    Nov 4, 2007
    mayweather by decision
     
  4. jecxbox

    jecxbox St. Brett Full Member

    7,608
    4
    Aug 5, 2007
    Floyd couldn't beat Oscar in his prime at 147lbs, No way He wouldn't have gotten past Oscars Jab that he could throw 5 times in a row in about 1 second. Oscars bull**** flurries were enough to sway the ******ed judges in the fight they had into Oscars favor enough for a SD, It would have been more flurries and more rounds Oscars way.
     
  5. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    42,076
    3,667
    Jun 30, 2005
    let's just say, by the will of god or whatever, the nevada judges are fair.

    then what happens?
     
  6. jecxbox

    jecxbox St. Brett Full Member

    7,608
    4
    Aug 5, 2007
    Oscar was too ****ing strong at 147lbs dude, He would have been so overpowered and blown away. Its sad as **** that the first fight was even competitive. Oscar is not even a shell of what he used to be!!! And Oscar still managed to make it close on the cards. I thought it was clear for Mayweather, but it should have been EASY. Oscar has NOTHING left. Put it this way If a Prime Pernell Whitaker fought The DLH that Floyd fought.......rofl! BLOW OUT!!!
     
  7. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    42,076
    3,667
    Jun 30, 2005
    so are you saying that it was a size thing more than a class/skill/ability thing?

    a prime whitaker was a lot smaller than the 154 lb. de la fishnet that mayweather beat, so i don't see the relevance there.

    pernell peaked at lightweight.
     
  8. joito3

    joito3 Active Member Full Member

    1,497
    1
    Mar 5, 2006
    fact is that as a welterweight whitaker fought and beat way better competition compared to lil floyds resume at 147 its not even close !
     
  9. jecxbox

    jecxbox St. Brett Full Member

    7,608
    4
    Aug 5, 2007
    was just making a point.

    A prime Floyd Mayweather won a SD (which was bs, should have been UD) over an Over the hill DLH.

    A Prime DLH won a decision (which was BS, I thought Pernell squeezed out the decision) on an Over the hill Whitaker.


    Reverse the rolls of Pernell Whitaker and DLH...Had Whitaker been in his prime and DLH had been the washed up fighter, Pernell Whitaker would have BEAT HIS ASSSSS, COLD!!! He wouldn't even have dropped a round to that bull**** that DLH brought to his fight with Floyd.
     
  10. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    42,076
    3,667
    Jun 30, 2005
    who's comparing whitaker and mayweather?

    that's another argument on another thread.
     
  11. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,315
    299
    Jul 23, 2004
    The De La Hoya who fought Gonzalez would have the best shot at beating Mayweather. Aggressive behind the jab, and his stamina wasn't an issue back then. Up until he took the last three rounds off against Trinidad he never had any stamina problems. Infact, De La Hoya had a history of closing the show 10 years ago.
     
  12. Alo2006

    Alo2006 R.I.P Sean Taylor Full Member

    10,020
    1,414
    Jun 28, 2006
    Mayweather by UD
     
  13. rodney

    rodney Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,337
    641
    Jun 16, 2006
    No one will ever know.
    "What if's" --- mean nothing.
    Yesterday is done.