true lol just debating with a troll. and this is coming from someone who is a way bigger loma fan than walters.
Yeah, I bet I can go through your post history and find a ton of mistakes. That's all you have? Look at the demographic. Squirming like the worm he is.
Yeah, he really did. He badly ducked Lomachenko. The guy that has brought horrid ratings, missed weight, and no belt? Who else could he have fought for that kind of pay? Dude said it himself that he couldn't win the fight. :rofl
I'd pick Loma to beat Walters. So what ratings has loma brought in? All his ratings are from being on pac's undercard. They deserved a 50/50 split, Loma has not proven to be a draw, and Walters has fought the bigger names. That's like saying Manny ducked Floyd because he wouldnt take a 40m offer atsch.
:good. It's just a waste of time. When we first started these boxing blogs years ago it was addicting. Then someone like that clown would come along, and you tried to change their mind, and you realized that they did stuff like that on purpose, and you argued them down. I don't waste my time anymore.
You are a demographic dunce don't pretend you're not, Blizzy But yeah, GGG is getting so much credit, but Lomachenko deserves it more. People always riding GGG, Loma won't get as much because he comes more-so from the school of slickness.
Bro, look at what Mayweather is today versus pre 2007. The fact that you talk about the man in retirement and never talk about guys like Calzaghe Tyson Holyfield Pavlik Martinez Pacquiao or any other legend that has retired since the year 2000 proves that you like Mayweather no matter how much you criticize. Who does not want to be considered the best of his generation? Think he is not? When was the last time you seen a positive Pacquiao thread on here or anywhere else? His fairweather fanbase is long gone.:-( If I look at your post and thread history when have you talked abut anyone besides Mayweather or Golovkin?
Yes, that's exactly why Walters shouldn't have gotten crazy pay. Walters was offered, what? I forgot the exact figures but it was close to 800K if he won. That's a lot more than Walters should be getting. Lower weight fighters don't make a ton of pay in the first place. Lomachenko was also giving up a weight advantage in moving up to Walters' weight. So you have two low draw fighters, one fighter taking the obvious greater risk, and Walters thinks he deserved more than 800K? I mean the dude said it himself that he had no chance of winning that's why he didn't even take the offer.
No it wasnt. The offer was a fking playground school bet, if you beat me I'll give you 300k isn't a 50/50 offer.