Other than the Walters fiasco

No I'm talking about this thread. Here's your comparison 800/500k winner loser is same as Mayweather offering Canelo 1 million and the winner takes the rest. Only a re**** would make such a ****ing comparison.

 

I guess Pac rejected a career high payday with the 40m offer too.

 

I was obviously exaggerating to make a point you utter **** . My point is side bets in general are a joke, and no an exaggeration is nto even close to as re****ed saying 800/500k with a side bet is basically 50/50 . That is literally the most re****ed thing posted on here in 2016.

 

You say that, but a slickster in Loma is still pushed to the side for GGG who doesn't exactly face very good opposition.

With regards to Walters, he needs to realise that $90k and whatever Loma offered him + the $300k prospective bonus is huge.

Walters knew full well Loma wanted his belt (not necessarily him) at 126, Walters all of a sudden can't make weight and moves up. Lomachenko chases him up to 130lbs (even though Loma only had a handful of fights and his prime weight was feather - he was yet to make a legacy there), offers Walters big money and Walters doesn't even respond, despite having a tough fight vs fringe contender Sosa and looking unimpressive vs Marriaga. He's still quiet.

 

Thanks, hopefully, it means I don't have to see your posts! :hi:

More so, I hope it means that you won't respond to me. I like it, but it sounds like you think this is supposed to make me feel bad? :rofl

 

Let's be honest, Loma-Walters is no May-Pac lol. The latter was a prospective 'fight of the century'.

 

Wrecked. :deal

 

What true colors? What are you on about? You really think I care if you think I'm biased or something? I wouldn't even deny it. I'm sure I'm biased for eastern european fighters in fact, though I try to stay as objective as I can. However, by the same tokean I also happen to think YOU'RE biased as ****.

What's funny is you trying to conceal your biases by pretending to like the fighters you don't, it's quite comedic. Everytime it's the same bull****, an argument starts: "Speaking as a much bigger fan of this guy than this guy...."

 

Ellerbe literally doesn't like any black fighters but always argues for them as a fan of the non black guy. Lmfao.

 

:rofl

 

Can you explain to me how I'm biased? I like Lomachenko far more than walters. If their race was reversed I'd be singing the same tune, I doubt most of you guys would be.

You say I'm trying to conceal my biases by pretending to like a fighter. So am I also pretending that I think Loma would absolutely school walters? And that Loma would school anyone from 126-135? , it doesn't seem like they're fighting, so why wouldn't I just say I think it's a 50/50 fight or I slightly favor Walters. I'm just calling it how I see it, the offer by Loma's side was not fair, and side bets are a joke. Tell me how often do these side bets happen in boxing? Exactly.

 

Uh no, I like plenty of black boxers.

Andrade
Ward
Crawford
Robert Easter
Spence
Thurman

 

If I think Ward schools GGG does that make me a Ward fan?

 

You still haven't answered me. How am I being biased? When is the last time you've seen someone get low-balled and then offered to be compensated for more if they won?

And idk you might be. It seems like you hate Ward fans more than Ward. Just like how I actually like Golovkin but hate his fans.

 

A career high payday is lowballed? Where else can Walters ever see 800K?