Both are the same size and have no power, Somehow Wallin is the better fighter for me and he should win on points...
Both stunningly mediocre. Their lack of power is staggering, I saw someone said somewhere that strong middleweights has more power than Wallin (it could be true!), but Wallin has the edge over McKean in skill and experience. Wallin has got an okay record for someone that looked that poor last night against Chisora - in beating Breazeale and Gassiev, plus the fight with Fury of course. Wallin is probably a weak to mid gatekeeper. Whereas, McKean is a good journeyman. Wallin points in a boring and cagey fight.
