just looking at the British Ratings on some other sites and the amount of Well Past It fighters, and worse inactive fighters STILL being listed in the Top 10 -20 is pathetic. at least years ago a fighter had to have 2 (or was it 4), fights a year or he missed out on being rated. I know boxing is wanting, but you can't honestly tell me that some of the young fighters TRYING to break through wouldn't accurately deserve a place in these ratings. in true British DESPERATION, we just continually hang onto the same Lies & BS and regurgitate the same names over & over again, which excludes others who might just represent us very well! great prospects getting left behind because they don't belong to the right people or "Hey we can keep generating a few pound off of this one or that one. Break away, take a ****ing chance and drop the ones that already had theirs and fell short. this is how we keep the game competitive and fighters Hungry for contention rights!
which ratings are you talking about? the BBBC doesnt have official ratings - which other ratings would prevent these young fighters getting their chance?
Boxrecs automated is it not? I thought it was all based on points system, don't know about the others though, probably just lazy journalism.
