I have to disagree with most of what is in the thread - I don't think Corrales-Castillo is overated, I don't think Ali-Frazier is overated, I certianly don't think Vasquez-Marquez III is overated. Why would Hagler-Hearns ever be considered overated! I can't think of a single fight that I would think to myself about, "oooo, that's underated, people like that fight more than it should be liked." I probably overate Robinson-LaMotta VI a little bit, but so what? Everyone has a favourite fight.
Absolutely agree. I understand the idea that everyone has a unique idea as to what a great fight is but I believe that there are just some things that just are what they are. This fight is one of (if not the #1) the greatest fight of all time IMO. Every round is different. It's two master craftsmen changing strategies seemingly round by round adapting a new style and a new way to try and outclass another master strategist. If Patton and Napoleon Bonaparte were to have a boxing fight, It'd probably look a bit like this.
I would strongly disagree with that statement. Everyone I have debated and often disagreed with on this classic forum, do not go to such an extreme that you feel unwelcome... IMO. To have an anti Ali view point is something I disagree with, but can fully understand why you might. Ali was put on this planet IMO to polarize views, which is a good thing.